期刊文献+

从人际功能角度剖析商务谈判会话中的权势关系

Analysis of Power Relations in Business Negotiation from the Perspectives of Interpersonal Function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从系统功能语法的人际功能角度出发,采取定量和定性分析方法,对商务谈判的会话进行分析,结果表明,在谈判中,买方处于主导地位,卖方处于从属地位,这种地位差异通过不同的语言手段得以体现。买卖双方语言手段的明显差别直接映射出双方在谈判过程中的权势差异,也说明了语言运用中确实存在着权势的不平衡现象。但是,如果语境发生变化,比如买卖双方的合作意图消失、谈判破裂、买卖关系终止等,上述结果都会发生变化,买方与卖方之间的权势关系也随之消失。 From the angle of interpersonal function in systemic functional grammar,this paper exam-ines business negotiation discourses in the aspects of mood and modality.Through a quantitative and quali-tative analysis of linguistic data,this paper finds that there exist unbalanced power relations between buyers and sellers.The buyers are dominant while sellers are subordinate in the process of negotiation.Their different status is manifested by different linguistic features.However,if the context changes,such as both the cooperation intention disappear,the breakdown of negotiations and the termination of trading relation-ship,the results will change as well as power relations between the buyer and seller will disappear.
作者 杨丽婷
出处 《长江大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第5期84-89,共6页 Journal of Yangtze University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 广东省高等职业教育教学改革项目(201401175)
关键词 商务谈判会话 权势关系 语气系统 情态系统 business negotiation power relations mood system modality system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1王立非,张斐瑞.商务英语谈判:国际研究现状分析及拓展(2004—2013)[J].外语教学,2014,35(4):5-10. 被引量:26
  • 2Brown, R. W., A. Gilman. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity [A]. T. Sebeok. Style in Language [ C]. Cambridge, MA : M. I. T. Press, 1985.
  • 3Thompson,G.Introducing Functional Grammar[M].Beijing: For- eign Language Teaching and Research Press,2008.
  • 4Hatliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. BeijingForeign Language Teaching and Research Press,2000.
  • 5范文芳.英语语气隐喻[J].外国语,2000,23(4):29-33. 被引量:121
  • 6Quirk et al.A Grammar of Contemporary English[M].London: Longman Group Ltd, 1972.
  • 7李战子.话语的人际意义研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2004.

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨坚争,桂安辉.电子商务视频谈判支持系统的研究[J].商场现代化,2007(11Z):170-171. 被引量:3
  • 2Agndal, H. Current trends in business negotiation research: An overview d articles published 1996-2005[ J]. Worlking Paper Series in Business Administration, 2007(3) :6-14.
  • 3Brown, P. & Stephen, C. Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage[ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 4Chatman, J. A, Putnam, L. L & Sondak, H. Integrating communication and negotiation research[ A]. In Bazerman M H, Lewicki R J & Sheppanl B H. (eds.). Research on Negotiation/n Organizations : Handbook of Negotiation Research[C]. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1991(3) : 139-164.
  • 5Curium, J et al. What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation [J].Jounal of Personality and Sacial Psychology, 2006(91 ) : 493-512.
  • 6Fant, L. Cultural mismatch in conversation: Spanish and Scandinavian communicative behavior in negotiation settings[ J ]. Journal of Linguistic, 1989(3) : 247-265.
  • 7Firth, A. Accounts in negotiation discourse: A single-case analysis[ J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1994(23) : 199-226.
  • 8Francis, D. W. Some structures of negotiation talk[ J]. Language in Society, 1986(15) : 53-79.
  • 9Ghauri , P. N. Negotiaing International Package Deals [ M ]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wissel, 1983.
  • 10Gibbons, P. Bradac, J. J. & Bush, J. D. The role of language in negotiations: Threats and promises[A]. In Putnam, L. L & Roloff, M. E. (eds.). Communication and Negotiation[C]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992:1.56-175.

共引文献172

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部