期刊文献+

常规彩色多普勒超声与弹性成像技术在诊断乳腺肿块中的价值 被引量:14

Conventional ultrasound and elastography in the diagnosis of breast nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合应用常规彩色多普勒超声与弹性成像技术在诊断乳腺肿块中的价值。方法对超声检查发现91例患者的98个乳腺肿块进行超声弹性成像与常规彩色多普勒超声检查,以术后病理结果作为金标准,对常规超声诊断,弹性成像诊断及两者联合诊断对乳腺肿块的鉴别价值分别采用SPASS18.0统计软件进行分析,率的比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果诊断乳腺肿块的敏感性、特异性及准确率比较:常规彩色多普勒超声分别为83.9%、68.7%及73.5%;超声弹性成像分别为:83.9%、59.7%及67.3%;而联合应用超声弹性成像与彩色多普勒超声检查诊断乳腺肿块优于前2种,分别为90.3%、91.0%及90.8%,三种检查方式在乳腺良恶性肿块的鉴别诊断中,差异均有统计学意义P<0.01。结论在运用超声诊断乳腺肿块时,联合应用常规彩色多普勒超声与弹性成像技术明显提高了准确率。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of combined application of B mode ultrasound and elastography in the diagnosis of breast nodules. Methods Clinical characteristics of 98 nodules in 91 patients were examined by conventional ultrasound and elastography, with postoperative pathology results as "gold standard". Comparison was made between the diagnosis of the ultrasound and pathology results by using SPASS 18. 0 software to evaluate clinical value of combined application of conventional ultrasound, and elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast nodules. The test was used in the ratio comparison, and P 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of breast nodules was 83.9% ,68.7% and 73.5% respectively by using B mode ultrasound, 83.9% ,59.70/0 ,and 67.3% by using elastography. However, these diagnostic indexes were 90. 3%, 91. 0% and 90. 8% respectively by using the combination of B mode ultrasound and elastography. There was significant difference between these three diagnostic performances in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The combination of B mode ultrasound and elastography improved the diagnostic accuracy of breast nodules.
作者 刘松涛
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2015年第3期62-64,共3页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 超声检查 多普勒 彩色 弹性成像技术 乳腺肿瘤 Ultrasonography, doppler, color Elasticity imaging technigues Breast neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Park JY, Yi SY, Park HJ, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging : correlations with mammographic and clinicopathologic characteris- tics of breast cancer[ J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2014,203 (1) : 223-228.
  • 2Kumar A, Srivastava V, Singh S, et al. Color Doppler uhrasonog- raphy for treatment response prediction and evaluation in breast cancer[J]. Future Onco1,2010,6 ( 8 ) : 1265-1278.
  • 3Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, et al. Elastography: new develop- ments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules [ J ]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007,92 ( 8 ) : 2917-2922.
  • 4Akcay MA, Semiz-Oysu A, Ahiskali R, et al. The value of ultra- sound elastography in differentiation of malignancy in thyroid nod- ules[J]. Clin Imaging,2014,38(2) :100-103.
  • 5谷英士,李颖嘉,文戈,位红芹,王冬晓,洪少馥.超声弹性成像与常规超声诊断乳腺癌腋淋巴结转移[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(11):1661-1664. 被引量:20
  • 6何萍,王金锐,崔立刚,葛辉玉,雷玉涛,赵红梅,陈文,贾建文.超声弹性成像对乳腺肿物BI-RADS分类的影响[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2014,23(9):782-785. 被引量:22
  • 7Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses : value of shear wave elastogra- phy according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultra- sound according to BI-RADS classification [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2012, 107(2) :224-229.
  • 8严松莉.乳腺超声与病理[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:90.
  • 9陈圆圆,李智贤,魏晏平,刘军杰,曾健,吴传妹.超声弹性成像对小乳腺癌的鉴别诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2013,29(6):504-506. 被引量:56
  • 10龚业琼,申俊玲.超声弹性成像蓝色比例对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2013,29(8):688-690. 被引量:21

二级参考文献39

  • 1荣雪余,冀鸿涛,朱强,肖萍.超声对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移诊断作用的评价[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(12):1812-1814. 被引量:17
  • 2罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:372
  • 3American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS),Ultrasound. 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 4Gheonea IA, Stoica Z, Bondari S. Differenlial diagnosis of breast lesions using ultrasound elastography. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2011, 21(4) :301-305.
  • 5Barr RG. Real-time uhrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q,2010,26(2) :61-66.
  • 6Regini E, Bagnera S, Tota D, et al. Role of sonoelastography in charaeterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions. Radiol Med, 2010,115 (4) :551-562.
  • 7Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127 (12) :2893-2917.
  • 8Elizabeth S Burnside, Timothy J Hall, Amy M Sommer, et al. Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Breast Masses with US Strain Imaging. Radiology, 2007, 245(2) :401-406.
  • 9Ioana Andreea Gheoneal, Li[iana Donoiu, D. Careen, et al. So- noelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2011, 52(4):1209-1214.
  • 10Richard G. Barr, Stamatia Destounis, Logan B. Lackey, et al. The valuation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity ima- ging. J Ultrasound Med, 2012,31 : 281-287.

共引文献110

同被引文献120

引证文献14

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部