期刊文献+

基于EU-R准则的多属性风险决策方法 被引量:1

EU-R Criterion based Method for Multi-Attribute Risk Decision Making
原文传递
导出
摘要 风险决策问题中确定方案间的优劣关系必须综合方案前景的期望效用以及前景风险.针对一类多属性风险决策问题,首先规范了其描述方法,其次明确了标准差-信息熵风险度量的概念,然后提出期望效用-风险评价准则,并建立方案的综合评价函数,能够反映决策者风险偏好和效用-风险权衡对决策的影响,最后通过算例验证所提方法的有效性,深入分析决策者主观态度与决策结果间的关系. In risk decision making problems, the preference relation among alternatives must be confirmed under the comprehensive consideration about the expected utility and risk of the alternatives' prospects. Firstly, this paper specifies the description method of one type multi- attribute risk decision making problems, then gives the risk measurement definition based on standard deviation-information entropy. Then the expected utility-risk criterion is proposed to evaluate the alternatives, and also the comprehensive evaluation function is established here, it can reflects how the decision maker's subjective risk preference and utility-risk equilibrium affect the decisions. Lastly the validity and effectiveness of proposed method is verified through one case, and the relations between subjective attitudes and decisions axe well analyzed. '
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2015年第12期111-118,共8页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
关键词 多属性风险决策 风险度量 EU-R准则 综合评价函数 multi-attribute risk decision making risk measurement eu-r criterion compre-hensive evaluation function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Chenghu Ma, Wing-Keung Wong. Stochastic dominance and risk measure: A decision-theoretic foundation for VaR and C-VaR[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010(207): 927-935.
  • 2Hans Peter Wachter, Thomas Mazzoni. Consistent modeling of risk averse behavior with spectral risk measures[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013(229): 487-495.
  • 3Marc J Goovaerts, RobKaas Roger J A. Laeven. Decision principles derived from risk measures [J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2010(47): 294-302.
  • 4Saman Eskandarzadeh, Kourosh Eshghi. Decision tree analysis for a risk averse decision maker: CVaR Criterion [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013(231): 131-140.
  • 5Yang J P, QIU W H. A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005(164): 92-799.
  • 6李英华,李兴斯,姜昱汐.信息熵度量风险的探究[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(5):111-116. 被引量:26
  • 7Hen Bleichrodt, Ulrich Schmidt, Horst Zank. Additive Utility in Prospect Theory[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(5): 863-873.
  • 8潘寒尽,张多林,方冬进,司维.模糊聚类与信息熵综合评价法在防空C^3I系统中的应用[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(5):19-21. 被引量:3
  • 9胡军华,周艺文.基于前景理论的多准则决策方法[J].Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC 2009), 2009: 2930-2934.

二级参考文献24

  • 1陈绍顺,宁伟华,张琳.防空战斗中的态势评估模型[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2004,5(4):29-33. 被引量:11
  • 2仪垂林,章仁俊.信息熵理论与行为金融学[J].财经科学,2004(6):29-33. 被引量:4
  • 3秦学志,应益荣.基于鞅和熵原理的资本资产定价方法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(5):460-462. 被引量:8
  • 4周林.效用函数在防空C3I系统效能评估中的应用[J].系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(1):13-15.
  • 5王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998
  • 6张跃.模糊数学方法及其应用方法[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1996.
  • 7Markowitz H.Portfolio selection[J].Journal of Finance,1952,7:71-91.
  • 8Sharpe W F.Capital asset prices:a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk[J].Journal of Finance,1964,19:425-442.
  • 9Jorion P.Measure the risk in value at risk[J].Financial Analysts Journal,1996,11:47-55.
  • 10Wirch J I,Hardy M R.A synthesis of risk measures for capital adequacy[J].Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,1999,25(3):337-347.

共引文献27

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部