期刊文献+

德国能源转型及其对新治理形式的需求 被引量:4

On the German Energiewende and Demand for New Forms of Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从分阶段弃核到分阶段逐步淘汰核能,再回到分阶段弃核,德国经历了数十载才做出了放弃核能的决定。对此,德国联邦政府表明自己对于2022年最终弃核和转向一个低碳的未来社会的决心显得尤为重要。能源转型呼唤对能源体制的深刻改造,使其从依赖核能和化石燃料进口转变为主要建立在可再生能源的基础之上。为此,德国面临着一个需要在能源生产体系、生产技术和过程、交通结构、城市规划、建筑业、农业甚至生活方式方面都进行深刻转变的挑战。这些转变将会提供很多崭新的机遇,以提高我们居住社区的质量。同时,也会有一些科技的、政治的、经济的或社会的必须克服的阻碍。如果没有德国联邦制架构中不同层级政府之间的密切协调,没有德国及其邻国和欧盟之间的密切协调,所期望的如此大规模的变革是不可能发生的。能源转型治理面对的挑战是巨大的,而德国面临的机遇也同样是巨大的。 Germany has experienced decades to make the decision to abandon nuclear energy, going through shifts in policies of phasing out its use of nuclear energy. The federal government of Germany is now committed to the future of phasing out nuclear energy and realizing the transition toward low carbon energy by 2022. The Ger- (energy transition) calls for a far-reaching transformation of Germany's energy system, from one dominated by nuclear energy and imports of fossil fuels to one based heavily on renewable energy. Germany is facing a dramatic challenge--one that requires sweeping transformations in energy producing systems, produ- cing technologies and processes, transportation structures, urban planning, construction, agriculture, and even life styles. The transition will provide new opportunities for improving the communities we live in. Yet, there will also be hurdles--some will be technical, others will be political, economic, or social. A transformation on such scale being planned cannot happen without considerable degree of coordination among different levels of govern- ment within Germany's federal structure as well as among Germany, its neighbors, and the European Union. The governance challenges are significant but the opportunities for Germany are also great.
出处 《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期12-18,共7页 Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
关键词 能源转型 分阶段弃核 可再生能源 欧盟治理 环境政治 energy transition phase-out renewable energy European Union governance environmental politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1埃伯哈德·乌姆巴赫.雄心勃勃的阿波罗计划:科学视野下关于能源转型的五个主题[EB/OL].[2014-06-13].http:∥www.zukunft.senergien.de/hp2/downloads/vortraege/umbach-fortschritt2012.pdf.
  • 2德国安全能源供应伦理委员会.德国能源转型:面向未来的共同事业[EB/OL].[2014-06-13].http:∥www.bmbf.de/pubRD/2011_05_30_abschlussbericht_ethikkommission_property_pub-licationFile.pdf.
  • 3德国环境咨询委员会.未来的电力市场[EB/OL].[2014-06-13].http://www.umweltrat.de/Shared.Does/Downloads/DE/02_Sondergutachtert/2013_11_SG_Strommarkt_der_Zukunft_gestahen.paf;jsessionid=BA8C8C1E5E10611B2D462DA27B430388.1_cid325?_blob=publicationFile.
  • 4联邦政府全球环境科学咨询委员会.转变中的世界:为了实现大转型的社会契约(2011年).
  • 5关于2020年能源减排目标的口舌之战已经打响.http://www.euractiv.com/energy-efficiency/battle-narratives-erupts-2020-en-news-528102.
  • 6《巴登-符腾堡州气候保护法案》,2013年7月23日.
  • 7下萨克森州环境、能源与气候保护部,《气候与能源机构着手工作》,新闻发布稿(40/214).

同被引文献77

  • 1郇庆治.生态现代化理论与绿色变革[J].马克思主义与现实,2006,58(2):90-98. 被引量:42
  • 2[美]杰里米·里夫金.《第三次工业革命:新经济模式如何改变世界》,张体伟,孙豫宁译.北京:中信出版社2012年版,第31页.
  • 3Albert Weale, "Ecological Modernisation and the Integration of European Environmental Policy", in J.D. Lief- ferink, P.D. Lowe and Arthur P.J. Mol eds., European Integration and Environmental Policy, London: Belhaven Press, 1993, pp.196-216.
  • 4Edward Goldsmith et al., "A Blueprint for Survival", Ecologist, Vol.2, No.l, 1972, Preface.
  • 5Rainer Hillebrand, "Climate Protection, Energy Security, and Germany' s Policy of Ecological Modemisation", Environmental Politics, Vol.22, No.4, 2013, p.665.
  • 6John W. Zillman, A History of Climate Activities世界气象组织网站:http://www.wmo.int/pages/publi-cations/bulletin—.en/58—3一zillman—en.html#top,lastaccessedon5February2010.
  • 7Nigel Haigh, "Climate Change Policies and Politics in the European Community", in Tim O' Riordan and Jill JaGer eds., Politics of Climate Change, London: Routledge, 1996, p.161.
  • 8European Commission, "The Greenhouse Effect and the Community. Commission Work Programme Concerning the Evaluation of Policy Options to Deal with the Greenhouse Effect", COM (88) 656 final, Brussels, 16 November 1988.
  • 9Andrew Jordan, Dave Huitema and Harro van Asselt, "Cliamte Change Policy in the European Union: an Intro- duction," in Andrew Jordan, Dave Huitema, Harro van Asseh, Tim Rayner and Frans Berkhout eds., Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p.9.
  • 10Jon Hovi, Tora Skodvin and Steinar Andresen, "The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States", Global Environmental Politics, Vol.3, No.4, 2003, pp.15-21.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部