期刊文献+

利用职务便利及后续影响侵占储户资金的行为定性——以王某某职务侵占、诈骗案为例 被引量:1

Research on the Nature of the Criminal Behavior of Using the Convenience of Duty and Subsequent Influence to Embezzle the Depositor's Deposit——Taking Wang's Duty Encroachment and Fraud as Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 职务侵占罪与诈骗罪在刑法分则的罪名设置中泾渭分明,但实践中若出现行为人混合实施利用职务便利行为与欺骗行为,而后非法侵占财产,如何认定性质或产生分歧。本文即通过具体案例予以剖析,将各类型行为分阶段梳理研判,分析该行为在犯罪中所起作用及与其他构成要件的内在关联,从而准确适用法律。 The difference between Crime of duty encroachment and Crime of fraud is obvious in the specific provisions of criminal law. But in practice if the perpetrator uses his position to facilitate the implementation of fraud behavior in a mixed way and then occupies the property illegally, it is likely to arouse the disagreement in identifying the nature. Through the analysis of specific cases, judgment on various types of behavior by stages, the authors analyze that the behavior plays the function in the crime and the inner association among other constituent elements to accurately apply the law.
出处 《天津法学》 2015年第2期108-112,共5页 Tianjin Legal Science
关键词 职务侵占罪 诈骗罪 犯罪构成 crime of duty encroachment crime of fraud constitution of crime
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

共引文献48

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部