期刊文献+

基于数据包络分析法的颈椎病中医综合方案的疗效评价 被引量:2

Effect Evaluation of TCM Integrated Programme of Cervical Spondylosis Based on Data Envelopment Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究数据包络分析法的颈椎病不同治疗方案的疗效评价。方法:3种治疗方案为针灸+中药离子透入+中药熏洗、推拿+中药离子透入+中药熏洗、针灸+推拿+中药离子透入+中药熏洗,投入指标为治疗总费用,产出指标为VAS评分比较及颈椎JOA功能评分改善指数,运用C2R模型和BC2模型进行数据包络分析。结果:针灸+推拿+中药离子透入+中药熏洗组的C2R及BC2模型效率值均显著高于其他两组,且在VAS评分比较、JOA评分改善率更接近理想情况。结论:对比临床上现有的方案评价方法,数据包络分析更为科学和实用,特别在中医综合方案选择上具有较大的应用推广价值。 Objective : To research data envelopment analysis method of cervical spondylosis curative effect evaluation of differ- ent treatments. Methods : Three treatment programs : acupuncture + penetrating herbal ion + herbal fumigation, manipulation + pene- trating herbal ion + herbal fumigation, acupuncture +mar, ipulation + penetrating herbal ion + herbal fumigation. Input indicators for the total cost of treatment. Output indicators for the VAS scores and cervical JOA score improvement index, C2R model and BC2 model using for data envelopment analysis. Results:C2R model and BC2 model efficiency values of acupuncture + manipulation + penetrating herbal ion + herbal fumigation group were significantly higher than that of the other two groups, and the VAS score, JOA score improvement rate were closer to the ideal situation. Conclusion:Among existing programs on comparative clinical evalu- ation methods,data envelopment analysis is more scientific and practical, especially in the application of TCM integrated pro- gramme,it has a bigger promotion value.
出处 《辽宁中医杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第6期1229-1230,共2页 Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家中医药管理局研究项目(JDZX2012126)
关键词 颈椎病 数据包络分析法 中医综合方案 疗效评估 cervical spondylosis data envelopment analysis TCM integrated programme efficacy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1杨小波,老膺荣,吴蕾.糖尿病中医药治疗性文献系统评价[J].浙江中医杂志,2004,39(9):389-391. 被引量:11
  • 2赖世隆.中医药临床疗效评价因果关联推断的探讨[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(4):293-296. 被引量:17
  • 3窦志芳,郭蕾,张俊龙,张鑫.中风病证候动态时空特征研究的思考[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(2):139-140. 被引量:3
  • 4Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ,2000,321(7262) :694-696.
  • 5Redfern J, McKevitt C, Wolfe CD. Development of complex interventions in stroke care: a systematic review. Stroke, 2006,37 (9) : 2410- 2419.
  • 6Bradley F, Wiles R, Kinmonth AL,et al. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research., case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ, 1999,318(7185) :711-715.
  • 7Loeb MB. Application of the development stages of a cluster randomized trial to a framework for valuating complex health interventions. BMC Health Serv Res, 2002,2 (1) : 13.
  • 8Power R, Langhaug LF, Nyamurera T, et al. Developing complex interventions for rigorous evaluation-a case study from rural Zimbabwe. Health Educ Res, 2004,19 (5) : 570-575.
  • 9Rowlands G, Sims J, Kerry S. A lesson learnt., the importance of modelling in randomized controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care. Fam Pract, 2005, 22 (1) :132-139.
  • 10王家良.临床治疗性研究的设计与评价[J].中华医学杂志,1999,79(2):94-96. 被引量:15

共引文献100

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部