基于CSSCI的图书情报学互引分析

Cross—Citation analysis of Library and Information Science Based on CSSCI

文章以中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)中1998-2011被连续收录的图书情报领域的14种期刊的题录数据为数据样本,以社会网络分析法为研究方法,分3个时间段研究最近14年间图书馆学与情报学期刊的互引情况以及图情学科的演进。研究发现,早期图书馆学的学科独立性以及自繁衍能力要比情报学好很多,但差距在逐渐缩小;图书馆学期刊的自引稳定性要比情报学好。研究探测到了学科输入型期刊、输出型期刊、自繁衍型期刊、输入输出均衡型期刊;情报杂志发展形势良好,存在着由输入型期刊向输入输出均衡型期刊过渡的迹象。情报学互引网络的密度要比图书馆学好,距离更易到达,网络的凝聚力也更为理想。中国图书馆学报是图书馆学中有重要影响的期刊,情报科学与情报杂志是情报学中有重要影响的期刊。中国图书馆学报与情报学报在各自的学科内被引用的路径是最短的。

Based on 14 journals of Library and Information Science in the Chinese social science citation index （CSSCI） 1998-2011, using the social network analysis, we research journals Cross----Citation analysis of Library and Information Science and the evolution of the discipline during recent 14 years. We found that at the early phase the disciplinary independence and the reproduction ability of library science and were better than information science, but the gap was narrowing. Self-citation stability of library science was better than information science. We detected input journals, output journals and reproduction journals, balanced journals. The development situation of Journal of Intelligence is well, and is transiting from input journals to balanced journals. Coupling network density and cohesion of information science were more ideal than library science. Journal of Library Science in China has an important influence, and Journal of Intelligence and Information Science have an important influence on information science. Journal of Library Science in China and Journal of the China Society of Information Science and Technology have the shortest reference oath within their respective disciplines.