4Stemitzke C, Bartkowski A, Schramm R. Vimalizing patent statistics by means of social netwonk malysis tools [J]. World Patent Infomaafion, 2008, 30(2):115-131.
5Chang P L, Wu C C, Leu H J. using patent analyses to monitor the technological roads in an emeiging field of technology. A case of carbon nanotube field emission display [J]. Sdentomerrics, 2010, 82(1):5-19.
6Yoon B, Park Y.A ten-based patent network: Analyfical tool for high-technology trend [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2004, 15(1):37-50.
7Wihelmsson M. The spatial dismbudon of inventor netwonk[J]. Annals of Regioml Science, 2009, 43(3):645-668.
8Lobo J, Strumsky D. Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, 63(3):871-884.
4Mclennan K L.Technology selection and marketing activities in higher education patenting and technology transfer[J].Dissertation Abstracts International,2003,64(12):60-61.
5Brody H.The TR university research scorecard[J].Technology Review,2001(9):81-83.
6Rachel Levy, Pascale Roux, Sandrine Wolff. An analy- sis of science - industry collaborative patterns in a large European University [ J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009, (34): 1 - 23.
7Roderik Ponds, Frank van Oort, Koen Frenken. Innova- tion, spillovers, and university - industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach [ R]. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography.
8Newman M E J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98 (2): 404 -409.
9Albert - L6szl6 Barab6si, Jeong H, Neda Z, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations [ J ]. Physica A -statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 311(3-4): 590-614.
10Newman M E J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration [ J ]. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 2004, 101 (Suppl. 1) : 5200 -5205.
