期刊文献+

U75V热处理钢轨滚动接触疲劳裂纹和磨耗试验 被引量:18

Experiment on the Rolling Contact Fatigue Crack and Wear of U75V Heat-treated Rail
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对U75V热处理钢轨进行不同通过总重时的表面观测、取样、磨耗测量、实验室疲劳裂纹长度与深度显微照相以及断面硬度测量,分析钢轨的轨距角滚动接触疲劳裂纹、磨耗和硬度的关系.研究发现,轨距角疲劳裂纹的发展包括裂纹快速萌生和扩展、裂纹-磨耗共存和发展、磨耗控制裂纹三个阶段.轨距角的裂纹向钢轨内部扩展,裂纹与钢轨纵向水平线呈10.8°-29.4°.硬化层硬度在340-360 HB及以上时,磨耗发展率小于0.015mm·Mt^-1,而疲劳裂纹萌生扩展较快,应考虑钢轨上道后至通过总重5-10 Mt期间实施新轨预打磨、通过总重30-60 Mt时实施预防性打磨,以平衡磨耗与裂纹的关系.同时,U75V热处理钢轨具有340-360HB及以上硬度的硬化层厚度应大于10mm. The relationship among rollong contact fatigue crack at the gauge corner, wear and hardness of the U75V heat-treated rails in field curve was analyzed by surface observation, sampling, wear measurement, laboratory photomicrograp for length and depth of the crack and hardness of the rail longitudinal cross-section measurement at different traffic. The research show that there were 3 main periods during the fatigue crack growth., crack initiation and rapid propagation, co-existence of crack and wear, and growth and wear control crack. The crack at the gauge corner propagated into the railhead with the angle of 10.8° to 29.4° with respect to the rail longitudinal surface. When the hardness of the heat-treated layer was 340 to 360 HB and above, the wear growth rate was less than 0. 015 mm · Mt^-1 with rapid fatigue crack growh. The rail pre-grinding from new rail installation to 5 to 10 Mt and preventive grinding with an interval of 30 to 60 Mt were recommended to balance the crack and wear. The thickness of the heat-treated layer with 340 to 360 HB and above should be over 10 mm.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期877-881,共5页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(50908179 51378395)
关键词 钢轨 裂纹 磨耗 硬度 显微照片 rail crack wear hardness photomicrography
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Li Z, Dollevoet R, Molodova M, et al. Squat growth--some observations and the validation of numerical predictions[J]. Wear, 2011, 271(1-2): 148.
  • 2Frederick C O. Future rail requirements[C]//Proceedings of Rail Quality and Maintenance for Modern Railway Operation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993: 3-14.
  • 3Olofsson U, Nilsson R. Surface cracks and wear of rail., a full scale test and laboratory study [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2002, 216(7): 249.
  • 4Zerbst U, Lund6n R, Edel K O, et al. Introduction to the damage tolerance behaviour of railway rails--a review[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(17): 2563.
  • 5MatsudaH, Satoh Y, Kanematsu Y, et al. On-site investigation and analysis of flaking damage leading to rail break[J]. Wear, 2011, 271(1-2): 168.
  • 6Franklin F J, Widiyarta I, Kapoor A. Computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigue[J]. Wear, 2001, 251(10): 949.
  • 7Li Z, Zhao X, Esveld C, et al. An investigation into the causes of squats--correlation analysis and numerical modeling [J]. Wear, 2008, 265(9-10): 1349.
  • 8Arias-CuevasO, Li Z, Lewis R, et al. Rolling-sliding laboratory tests of friction modifiers in dry and wet wheel-rail contacts[J]. Wear, 2010, 268(3-4): 543.
  • 9Zhong W, Hu J J, Shen P, et al. Experimental investigation between rolling contact fatigue and wear of high-speed andheavy-haul railway and selection of rail material[J]. Wear, 2011, 271(9-10): 2485.
  • 10Stock R, Pippan R. RCF and wear in theory and practice--the influence of rail grade on wear and RCF[J]. Wear, 2011, 271 (1-2) : 125.

同被引文献126

引证文献18

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部