期刊文献+

社会抚养费争议的焦点、实质、本源

The Focus,Essence and Origin of Disputes about Social Cost of Upbringing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为保障计划生育政策推行的核心制度,社会抚养费制度被赋予诸多功能。伴随着民众生育观念的转变和我国老龄化社会的到来,加之社会抚养费制度本身存在的缺陷,使得实践中问题层出不穷,由此引发了人们对其极大的关注,甚至萌生了存废的争论。对社会抚养费的争议折射出我国计生领域的各种乱象,及其乱象背后隐藏着的更为深层次的原因。通过分析社会抚养费争议的焦点、实质、本源,揭示其乱象背后的根源,认为应该废除不利于推动社会公平的社会抚养费制度,这样,才有利于把握我国计生工作未来发展的脉络,促进经济社会健康和谐地发展。 As the core system of implementing the Family Planning Policy, the system of social cost of upbringing is endowed with many functions. With the transformation of public attitude to- wards birth, the arrival of China's aging society and the defects of the system of social cost of up- bringing itself, problems emerge in practice endlessly, which has initiated people's great concern and even sparked the debate of remaining or abolishing. The disputes concerning social cost of upbringing reflect all kinds of chaos in the field of family planning and their more deep-seated rea- sons. By analysing the focus, essence and origin of social cost of upbringing and revealng the root of its chaos, this paper holds that the system is not conducive to promoting social equity and should quit from the stage of history. Then we can grasp the future development of family plan- ning in China and promote the sound and harmonious development of our economic society.
作者 顾德瑞
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期29-33,共5页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 社会抚养费争议 焦点 实质 本源 disputes about social cost of upbringing focus essence origin
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1黄文政,梁建章.张艺谋应拒交社会抚养费[EB/OL].[ 2013-06-05 ]. http..//opinion, caixin, com/2013-06-05/ 100537357. html.
  • 214名律师致信国家审计署追问社会抚养费去向[EB/OL].[2013-09-02].http:news.xinhuanet.com/poli-tics/2013-09-02/c-117179990.html.
  • 3吕骞.审计署公布9省市45县社会抚养费审计调查结果[EB/OL].[2013-09-18].http://finance.people.com.cn/n/2013一09一18/c1004-22967935.html.
  • 4严琪.社会抚养费争议不断该废还是留?[N].北京晚报.2015-01-05(38).
  • 5韩震,俞吾金,郭齐勇,陈乔见,李建华.社会公平正义与政治文明建设:公平正义的和谐社会与核心价值观念[J].中国社会科学,2009(1):44-50. 被引量:127
  • 6秦廷国.略论社会主义社会的公平正义[J].政治学研究,2008(4):37-43. 被引量:6
  • 7[美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009:3.
  • 8[德]古斯塔夫·拉德布鲁赫.法哲学[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:81.
  • 9西汉·戴圣.礼记·礼运[G].北京:蓝天出版社,2008.
  • 10罗豪才,宋功德.人权法的失衡与平衡[J].中国社会科学,2011(3):4-19. 被引量:40

二级参考文献176

共引文献559

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部