中国美学研究“另一面”——国际汉学界山水美学成果选评

The other side of Chinese landscape studies: aesthetic research achievements in the international Chinese Philosophy

近期国际汉学界山水美学论文大多以问题为中心,以中国哲学术语为核心话语,追求原创,注重理论实践结合。既有以中国古代宇宙论的"气优先论""水首生论"与中外文论结合,揭橥山水美学研究路径的哲思;也有检视中国山水景观源流与西方"景观"差异的力作;更有从中国古代山水作为诗画大家"游、居之所"出发,用后现代话语阐释中国山水及其诗画"读什么"和"怎样读";或对"通感"与山水诗画之"兴"的探讨。由此形成海外中国美学研究一种特色。

Recent researches on Chinese aesthetics in the international Chinese philosophical circle outside of theChina's Mainland have some noteworthy features with problem-solving as the orientation, philosophical terminology asthe core discourse, originality as the goal, and combination of theory and practice as the attention. Some combinedomestic and foreign theories to explore ancient Chinese cosmology, attempting to explicate the philosophical meaningof the idea that “landscape manifests Tao.” Some expound eastern and western differences through theoretical originsof two main types of landscapes： the Europe Renaissance’s and the “Chinese landscape culture’s.” Others start withChinese ancient landscape to study great masters in painting and poetry, interpret “what to read” and “how to read”about Chinese landscape painting and poetry with the post-modern hermeneutics perspective, and even apply QianZhongshu’s idea of Synaesthesia to interpret “the openness and dynamic existence” of landscape poetry. Suchinnovative ideas presented in international Chinese philosophical conferences should not be ignored by their colleaguesin China.