期刊文献+

经尿道等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床分析 被引量:9

Clinical analysis of transurethral plasma kinetics enucleation in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术在治疗良性前列腺增生中的临床应用效果。方法选取行经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术的良性前列腺增生患者26例,对其手术时间、术中出血量、切除组织量进行记录,术后3个月随访,比较手术前后的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、残余尿量(RU)、最大尿流率(Qmax)等指标,评价其临床疗效,并记录治疗过程中的不良事件。结果术中平均切除组织量、术中出血量、手术时间,分别为(46.77±13.58)g、(17.46±8.22)g·L-1、(89.31±21.67)min;术后IPSS评分、QOL评分、平均Qmax与平均RU,分别是(10.65±3.059)分、(1.23±0.815)分、(19.31±3.782)m L·s-1、(18.54±21.39)m L。术后各项观察指标与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后常见的并发症是包膜穿孔、尿道狭窄、再次出血。结论经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术在治疗良性前列腺增生中是安全有效的,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Methods The clinical data of 26 cases with BPH treated with PKEP were analyzed. The opera- tion time, bleeding, resected tissue weight of prostate,adverse events during the treatment were recorded. After 3 months follow - up, the clinical efficacy by compare the date before and after operation, included the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QOL) , post void residual (PVR) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) was evaluated. Results The average resected tissue weight of prostate ,bleeding,operation time were respectively(46.77 ± 13.58 ) g, ( 17.46 ±8.22) g · L^- 1, ( 89.31±21.67 ) min. The IPSS, QOL, Qmax and PVR were respectively 10.65 ± 3. 059,1.23 ± 0.815, ( 19.31 ± 3. 782 ) mL· s^ -I, ( 18.54 ±21.39 ) mL. IPSS, QOL, PVR and Qmax were significant improved in the patients after the operation ( P 〈0. 05 ). The common complications were capsular perforation, ure- thral stricture and secondary bleeding. Conclusion PKEP is an effective and safe therapy in the treatment of BPH.
出处 《宁夏医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期536-538,共3页 Ningxia Medical Journal
基金 宁夏自然科学基金资助项目(NZ13184)
关键词 良性前列腺增生 等离子 剜除 Benign prostatic hyperplasia Plasma Enucleation of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1郑少波,刘春晓,徐亚文.前列腺腔内逆行剥离法在经尿道前列腺汽化切除术中的应用[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(6):734-735. 被引量:66
  • 2郑少波,刘春晓,徐亚文,李虎林,方平,徐啊白,陈玢屾.腔内剜除法在经尿道前列腺汽化电切术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(8):558-561. 被引量:212
  • 3HOCHREITER WW, THALMANN GN, BURKHARD FC, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with eleetrocautery reseetion the mushroom technique[J]. Urology, 2002,168 .. 1470-1474.
  • 4BHANSALI M, PATANKAR S,DOBHADA S, et al. Management of large(60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate[J]. Endourol, 2009,23:141-145.
  • 5MAMOULAKIS C, UBBINK DT, DE LA ROSETTE JJMCH. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials[J]. Eur Urol, 2009,56 : 798-809.
  • 6GUO C, LI F, WANG B, et al. Transurethral plasmakinetie Vaporization of prostate for treatment of the aged BPH patients [J].J Clin Urol,2004,19:391-392.
  • 7BREDA G, CELIA A, ZECCOLINI G, et al. E-TURP: Technical Evolution of TURP[J]. Eur Urol, 2008,7 (3) : 332.
  • 8NEILL G M, PETER J. Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J] Urology, 2006,5 (68) : 1020-1024.
  • 9ROCCO B,ALBO G,FERREIRA RC,et al.Recent advances in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Ther Adv Urol.2011,3(6):263-272.
  • 10MAVUDURU RM,MANDAL AK,SINGH SK,et al.Comparison of HoLEP and TURP in terms of efficacy in the early postoperative period and perioperative morbidity[J].Urol Int,2009,82(2):130-135.

共引文献302

同被引文献56

引证文献9

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部