期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术对子代儿童患恶性肿瘤风险的Meta分析 被引量:2

A Meta analysis of the cancer incidence of children conceived by assisted reproductive technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价辅助生殖技术(ART)对子代儿童恶性肿瘤发生率的影响。方法通过计算机检索EBSCO全文数据库、Pubmed、德国Springer期刊数据库、Cochrane Libarary、中国学术期刊网络出版总库期(CNKI)、万方和维普中文期刊全文数据库等,并辅助其他检索方式,纳入ART术后妊娠和自然妊娠的儿童健康状况的队列研究,使用RevMan5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果研究共纳入符合标准文献16篇,共89 894例ART出生子代。Meta分析结果显示,ART与非ART出生子代恶性肿瘤发生率之间差异无统计学意义(OR=1.85,P>0.05)。结论 ART子代罹患恶性肿瘤的概率与非ART基本一致,但其远期的潜在风险尚未明确。 Objective To evaluate the incidence of cancer in children born with assisted reproductive technology (ART ) . Methods The literatures were obtained by computer through EBSCO full‐text database ,Pubmed ,Germany Springer journal data‐base ,Cochrane Libarary ,Chinese academic journals published in the pool of network (CNKI) ,Wanfang and Veipu Chinese Journal Full‐text databases ,and other search methods .ART and child health natural pregnancy cohort study were included .The Meta‐anal‐ysis was conducted by using RevMan5 .0 software .Results Sixteen studies were included according to the criteria ,and 89 894 cases of ART‐born offspring were collected .The results of Meta analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between ART and non‐ART children on the incidence of tumor (OR= 1 .85 ,P〉0 .05) .Conclusion This study showed that the probability of ART offspring suffering from malignant is basically the same with non‐ART children ,but the potential long‐term risks are not yet clear .
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第18期2524-2526,2530,共4页 Chongqing medicine
基金 国家临床重点专科建设项目(国卫办医[2013]544号)
关键词 生殖技术 辅助 肿瘤 META分析 reproductive techniques,assisted neoplasms Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Kupka M, et al. Assisted re- productive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE[J]. Hum Reprod, 2013,28(9) :2318-2331.
  • 2Farquhar C,Rishworth JR,Brown J, eta[. Assisted repro- ductive technology:an overview of Coehrane Reviews[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 201a, 8 : CD010537.
  • 3章瑜,黄荷凤.辅助生殖技术安全性研究进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(10):796-800. 被引量:10
  • 4White L, Giri N, Vowels MR, et al. Neuroectodermal turnouts in children born after assisted conception [J]. Lancet,1991,336(8730) :1577.
  • 5Rufat P, Olivennes F, De Mouzon J, et al. Task force re- port on the outcome of pregnancies and children conceived by in vitro fertilization (France: 1987 to 1989) [J]. Fertil Steril,1994,61(2) :324-330.
  • 6Doyle P, Bunch KJ, Beral V, et al. Cancer incidence in children conceived with assisted reproduction technology [J]. Lancet,1998,352(9126) :452-453.
  • 7Bergh T, Ericson A, HillensjO T, et al. Deliveries and chil- dren born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95 : a retrospective cohort study[J]. Lancet,1999,354(9190) :1579 -1585.
  • 8Bruinsma F, Venn A, Lancaster P, et al. Incidence of canc- er in children born after in-vitro fertilization[-J]. Hum Re- prod, 2000,15 (3) : 604-607.
  • 9Lerner-Geva L, Toren A, Chetrit A, et al. The risk for cancer among children of women who underwent in vitro fertilization[J]. Cancer, 2000,88 (12) : 2845-2847.
  • 10Klip H,Burger CW,De Kraker J,et al. Risk of cancer 'in the offspring of women who underwent ovarian stimula- tion for IVF[J]. Hum Reprod,2001,16(11) ..2451-2458.

二级参考文献44

  • 1Lancaster PA. Congenital malformations after in-vitro fertilisation [ J]. Lancet, 1987, 2 : 1392-1393.
  • 2Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, et al. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization[J]. N Engl J Med,2002, 346:725-730.
  • 3Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology[J]. N Engl J Med,2002,346:731-737.
  • 4Sehieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB,et al. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States[ J]. Obstet Gynecol,2004,103: 1144-1153.
  • 5Klemetti R, Gissler M, Sevon T, et al. Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies[ J]. Fertil Steril 2005, 84 : 1300-1307.
  • 6Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol,2004,103:551-563.
  • 7Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception : a systematic review of controlled studies[ J]. Bmj ,2004,328:261.
  • 8Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, et al. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children [ J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2004, 21:437-443.
  • 9Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E,et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review [ J ]. Hum Reprod,2005,20 : 328-338.
  • 10McDonald SD, Murphy K, Beyene J, et al. Perinatel outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27:449-459.

共引文献9

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部