期刊文献+

In-vitro vs in-vivo Inoculation: Screening for Resistance of Australian Rice Genotypes Against Blast Fungus

In-vitro vs in-vivo Inoculation: Screening for Resistance of Australian Rice Genotypes Against Blast Fungus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 To assist with rapid screening for rice blast resistance as a precursor in a breeding program, the susceptibility to rice blast of 13 rice genotypes from Australia was evaluated in May to June 2013 using three distinct inoculation methods(spot, filter paper and standard methods) at seedling, vegetative and reproductive stages. The results revealed that the spot and filter paper inoculation methods were successful in discerning susceptibility to the rice blast disease(P ≤ 0.05). Disease susceptibility declined significantly from the vegetative to reproductive stages. The standard method was conducted at three different stages for pot plants grown inside the mist house. However, low temperatures did not produce disease symptoms except in a few genotypes. Among the 13 rice genotypes screened, AAT9 expressed a highly resistant response, and AAT4, AAT6, AAT10, AAT11, AAT13, AAT17 and AAT18 expressed resistance at various stages. The results will be useful for selecting elite genotypes for disease tolerance where rice blast is prevalent. In addition, the resistant genotypes can serve as a gene pool used in breeding programmes to develop new resistant genotypes. To assist with rapid screening for rice blast resistance as a precursor in a breeding program, the susceptibility to rice blast of 13 rice genotypes from Australia was evaluated in May to June 2013 using three distinct inoculation methods(spot, filter paper and standard methods) at seedling, vegetative and reproductive stages. The results revealed that the spot and filter paper inoculation methods were successful in discerning susceptibility to the rice blast disease(P ≤ 0.05). Disease susceptibility declined significantly from the vegetative to reproductive stages. The standard method was conducted at three different stages for pot plants grown inside the mist house. However, low temperatures did not produce disease symptoms except in a few genotypes. Among the 13 rice genotypes screened, AAT9 expressed a highly resistant response, and AAT4, AAT6, AAT10, AAT11, AAT13, AAT17 and AAT18 expressed resistance at various stages. The results will be useful for selecting elite genotypes for disease tolerance where rice blast is prevalent. In addition, the resistant genotypes can serve as a gene pool used in breeding programmes to develop new resistant genotypes.
出处 《Rice science》 SCIE CSCD 2015年第3期132-137,共6页 水稻科学(英文版)
关键词 spot inoculation filter paper inoculation standard method seedling stage vegetative stage reproductive stage rice blast disease rice genotype spot inoculation filter paper inoculation standard method seedling stage vegetative stage reproductive stage rice blast disease rice genotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Castejón-Mu?oz M, Lara-álvarez I, Aguilar M. 2007. Resistance of rice genotypes to Pyricularia oryzae in Southern Spain. Span J Agric Res, 5: 59–66.
  • 2Chase A R, Jones J B. 1986. Effects of host nutrition, leaf age, and preinoculation light levels on severity of leaf spot of dwarf schefflera caused by Pseudomonas cichorii. Plant Dis, 70: 561–563.
  • 3Ghazanfar M U, Habib A, Sahi S T. 2009. Screening of rice germplasm against Pyricularia oryzae the cause of rice blast disease. Pak J Phytopathol, 21: 41–44.
  • 4Inukai T, Nelson R J, Zeigler R S, Sarkarung S, Mackill D J, Bonman J M, Takamure I, Kinoshita T. 1994. Allelism of blast resistance genes in near-isogenic lines of rice. Phytopathology, 84: 1278–1283.
  • 5Jia Y, Valent B, Lee F N. 2003. Determination of host responses to Magnaporthe grisea on detached rice leaves using a spot inoculation method. Plant Dis, 87: 129–133.
  • 6Miura Y, Ding C, Ozaki R, Hirata M, Fujimori M, Takahashi W, Cai H, Mizuno K. 2005. Development of EST-derived CAPS and AFLP markers linked to a gene for resistance to ryegrass blast (Pyricularia sp.) in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Theor Appl Genet, 111: 811–818.
  • 7Panter S N, Jones D A. 2002. Age-related resistance to plant pathogens. Adv Bot Res, 38: 251–280.
  • 8Pretorius Z A, Rijkenberg F H J, Wilcoxson R D. 1988. Effects of growth stage, leaf position and temperature on adult-plant resistance of wheat infected by Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici. Plant Pathol, 37: 36–44.
  • 9Ribot C, Hirsch J, Balzergue S, Tharreau D, Nottéghem J L, Lebrun M H, Morel J B. 2008. Susceptibility of rice to the blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. J Plant Physiol, 165: 114–124.
  • 10Rupe J C, Gbur E E. 1995. Effects of plant age, maturity group, and the environment on disease progress of sudden death syndrome of soybean. Plant Dis, 79: 139–143.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部