期刊文献+

“研究修辞”视角下的批评话语分析 被引量:2

A Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis from the Perspective of “Rhetoric of Inquiry”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "研究修辞"认为,知识生产和学术也是修辞和话语实践,因而必然受制于历史情境因素,充满说服和权力运作。从"研究修辞"的视角,将批评话语分析作为一种特殊的话语形态,即关于语言、话语及社会的学术话语或修辞实践,以批评话语分析所倡导的批评精神对其进行修辞分析和学术反思,解析其作为一种学术研究范式成功崛起的话语运作机制。研究揭示,批评话语分析不仅与修辞有着共同的理论旨趣,其学术话语实践也充盈着修辞运作,其在学术上的成功是运用符合学术场域话语逻辑的修辞发明策略的结果,因而也体现了修辞转向。这也证明了修辞与论辩在学术创造、知识生产和思想传播中的合法性和不可或缺性。 " Rhetoric of inquiry" maintains that knowledge production and academic practice are themselves rhetorical and discursive practices hence necessarily bound by historical and contingent factors and saturated with persuasion and power. Like this, critical discourse analysis can itself be taken as both a discourse and a rhetorical practice, and thus it can be critically anatomized from the perspective of "rhetoric of inquiry" to uncover the modus operandi of its successful rise as a research paradigm. It is revealed that critical discourse analysis embodies the rhetorical turn in which it is also committed to the theoretical interests upheld by rhetorical studies and its academic success is the result of rhetorical inventions fully sanctioned by the logic of the academia. This further demonstrates the indispensability and legitimacy of rhetoric and argumentation in academic creation, knowledge production and the dissemination of ideas.
作者 涂家金
出处 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期149-154,共6页 Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家留学基金项目"论辩修辞理论与中国话语实践研究"(201309360003)
关键词 批评话语分析 “研究修辞” 论辩 学术话语 修辞发明 critical discourse analysis "rhetoric of inquiry" argumentation academic discom^e rhetoricalinvention
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change [ M ]. Cambridge : Polity Press, 1992.
  • 2Wodak R. What CDA Is about[ G]//Wodak R,Meyer M, Ed. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SagePublications Ltd. ,2001.
  • 3Blommaert J. Discourse: A Critical Introduction [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 4Chouliarake L, Fairclough N. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis [ M ]. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
  • 5Rufo K. Rhetoric & Power: Rethinking & Relinking [ J ]. Argumentation & Advocacy,2003,40.
  • 6MeKerrow R. Critical Rhetoric: Theory & Praxis [ J ]. Communication Monographs, 1989,56.
  • 7McGee M. The "Ideograph" : A Link between Rhetoric & Ideology [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1980,66.
  • 8Burke K. Language as Symbolic Action [ M ]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.
  • 9Nelson J, et al. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language & Argument in Scholarship & Public Affairs [ M ]. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
  • 10张瑜.西方哲学与修辞学的历史渊源及学术走向[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,43(5):138-142. 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

  • 1张宗正.宏观视野下的行为修辞[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(5):7-12. 被引量:7
  • 2亚里士多德.修辞学[M].罗念生译.上海:上海世纪出版社集团,2005:3,4.
  • 3伽达默尔.科学时代的理性[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,1988..
  • 4伽达默尔.哲学解释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1994..
  • 5王一川.语言乌托邦[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1994..
  • 6伊格尔顿.二十世纪西方文学理论[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社,1986.15.
  • 7刘亚猛.西方修辞学史[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.20108.
  • 8John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
  • 9徐友渔,周国平,陈嘉映.语言与哲学:当代英关与德法传统比较研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996.
  • 10邓志勇.修辞理论与修辞哲学[M].上海:学林出版社,12011.

同被引文献50

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部