摘要
目的对比微创血肿淬吸术与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血效果。方法 74例患者分为A、B两组,分别行微创血肿淬吸术与开颅血肿清除术治疗。结果 A组优良率高于B组,NIHSSS评分、并发症发生率较B组低,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论微创血肿淬吸术治疗高血压脑出血更为显著。
Objective Compare the effect on minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration and craniotomy evacuation of hematoma in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods 74 patients were divided into A, B groups, respectively for minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration and craniotomy. Results In group A, the excellent and good rate was higher than the group B, NIHSSS score, incidence rate of complications was lower than the B group, P〈0.05,had difference statistically sigiifcnance. Conclusion Minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage is more signiifcant.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第16期92-93,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
微创血肿淬吸术
开颅血肿清除术
高血压脑出血
Minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration, Evacuation of hematoma, Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage