4Lew in J M,Hendfiek R F,Dorsi C J,et al.Comparative of Full-field digita/mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: result of 4 945 paired examinations[J].Radiology, 2001,218 (3) : 873-880.
3Lewin JM,Hendrick RE,D'Orsi CJ,et al.Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection:results of 4,945 paired examinations[J].Radiology,2001,210(3):873-880.
4Kuhl CK,Schild HH.Dynamic image interpretation of the breast[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,12(6):965-974.
5Nunes LW,Schnall MD,Orel SG.Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretion model[J].Radiology,2001,219(2):484-494.
6Kuhl CK,Mielcareck P,Klaschik S,et al.Dynamic breast MR imaging:Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions[J]? Radiology,1999,211(1):101-110.
7Orel SG,Schnall MD.MR imaging of the breast for the detection,diagnosis,and staging of breast cancer[J].Radiology,2001,220(1):13-30.
8Liu PF,Debatin JF,Caduff RF,et al.Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis[J].Br J Radiol,1998,71(845):501-509.
9Obenauer S,Hermann KP,Schorn C,et al.Full-field digital mammography:dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis[J].Rofo,2000,172(12):1052-1056.
10Fischer U,Baum F,Obenauer S,et al.Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications:full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography[J].Eur Radiol,2002,12(11):2679-2683.
