期刊文献+

宋代亲属财产诉讼中的“利益衡平”艺术及其当代借鉴 被引量:4

Judicial Art of “Equitable Interest”and Its Contemporary Reference in the Property Litigation of the Relatives in Song Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在社会变动情势下,宋代亲属间争财竞产,无日无之。宋代法官们在涉及居丧嫁娶、奁产性质、不孝子免惩、田宅交易、户绝立嗣继产、遗嘱继承等亲属间财产诉讼中,能够根据具体个案事实,在综合考量法意法理、民意民情、风俗习惯、血缘伦理的基础上,以"利益衡平"的司法艺术与精神,追求个案的实质正义和判决的社会良性效果,解决了法律僵化滞后与社会变动不居之间的张力,较为彻底妥当地化解了亲属间财产纷争,维护了血缘伦理亲情与家庭和谐。宋代法官"利益衡平"的司法艺术品质,是其实践理性与经验智慧的结晶,体现的是宋代法官在权变精神涵养下的价值判断和能动创造性,对当代民事财产纠纷的化解,能够提供可资借鉴的历史本土法律文化资源。 There were many property litigation among the relatives every day under the background of changeable situation in Song Dynasty. Involving property litigation among relatives, such as marriage in mourning period, trousseaux nature, unpunished disobedient child, transactions of farmland and residence, inheriting property about successor in the family without son, testamentary succession, Judgers in Song Dynasty achieved substantive justice in the individual cases and positive social effects, creatively solved the tension between inflexible and lagged law and changeable society, and at last thor- oughly and properly resolved property disputes between relatives, maintained blood relationship ethics and family harmony, depending on the facts of the case, on the basis of comprehensive consideration of the legal spirit and jurisprudence, public sentiments, customs and habits, ethics blood, and through judicial art and spirit of " equitable interest". Judicial artistic quality of "equitable interest" in Song Dynasty was the crystallization of its practical ration- ality and wisdom derived from the experience, reflected the value judgments and dynamic creativity of judgers in Song Dynasty under the cultivation of flexible sprits, and was able to provide law and cultural resources of the native Chinese history in resolving property disputes in civil contemporary.
出处 《兰州学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期106-114,共9页
基金 司法部2014年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目专项任务课题"中国古代司法审判艺术研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:14SFB5005) 2014年度安徽省高校省级人文社会科学研究重点项目"‘中国古代卡迪司法’说之批判--以宋代诉讼证据制度为视角"的阶段性成果(项目编号:SK2014A375)
关键词 宋代法官 亲属 财产争讼 利益衡平 审判艺术 启迪与借鉴 Judgers in Southern Song Dynasty relatives property disputes equitable interest trial art enlightenment and reference
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1夏征农.辞海[Z].上海:上海辞书出版社,2000.
  • 2[意大利]桑德罗·斯奇巴尼亚选编.民法大全选译·正义和法[M].黄风译.北京.中国政法大学出版社,1992.34.
  • 3[美]罗斯科·庞德 唐前宏.普通法的精神[M].北京:法律出版社,2001..
  • 4[日]大木雅夫.比较法[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.60-62.
  • 5胡平仁.诉讼艺术初探[J].法制与社会发展,2008,14(2):3-12. 被引量:7
  • 6王拭主编.严复集.第3册[M].北京.中华书局,1986.668.
  • 7宋·脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • 8宋·范仲淹.范文正公文集[M].成都.四川大学出版社,2002.159.
  • 9中国社会科学院历史研究所.名公书判清明集[M].宋辽金元史研究室点校.北京.中华书局,1987.
  • 10宋·苏东坡.苏轼文集[M].北京.中华书局,1981.1009-1010.

二级参考文献16

  • 1邓少岭.论法律的艺术之维[J].政治与法律,2005(2):3-10. 被引量:9
  • 2[法]亨利·莱维·布律尔 许钧译.法律社会学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.10-11.
  • 3王泽鉴.法律思维与民法实例[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001..
  • 4[法]蒲鲁东.什么是所有权[M].孙署冰,译.北京:商务印书馆,1982:103.
  • 5Eugen Ehrlich. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law [ M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press , 1936.
  • 6[英]登特列夫.自然法[M].李日章译.台北:台湾联经出版事业公司,1984.
  • 7[意]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜译.北京:人民文学出版社,1986.
  • 8[加]克里希南.现代犯罪侦查导论[M].北京:群众出版社,1986.
  • 9徐恭典.法律进化之概观.法律评论,1924,(9).
  • 10John C. H. Wu. The Art of Law and other Essays Juridical and Literary [ M ]. Shanghai : The Commercial Press, 1936.

共引文献266

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部