摘要
亚里士多德在《诗论》中对"诗(ποíησιζ)"与"史(íστορíα)"作了明确的区分,部分学者也常以此区分来断定或阐述希腊历史学地位的低下。笔者研究发现,《诗论》中的(íστορíα)并不是指普遍意义上的古代希腊历史学,而是指具体意义上的íστορíα,也就是希罗多德创作的历史学。从对象指属、相关内容等方面均可见出。
Aristotle has made a clear distinction between the " poem (ποíησιζ)" and the " history (ltr1"opict) " in the Poetics. On the basis of the comments, Some scholars tend to conclude that the history is of the low status in ancient Greek. However, I' ve found that the term "history (íστορíα)" in the Poetics does not mean the history of the ancient Greek on the common sense, it means the íστορíα in specific terms , namely the history of Herodotus' version. This article will reason in details in terms of the referring objects, its related con- tent and some other aspects.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期92-94,共3页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
教育部人文社会重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD770022)