期刊文献+

256排CTA诊断阻塞性冠心病的准确性与冠状动脉造影对比 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价256排CT血管造影(CTA)诊断阻塞性冠心病(CAD)的准确性。方法分别用256排CT血管造影(ICA)和冠状动脉造影对155例可疑的冠心患者进行检查,采用多平面重建、曲面重建和最大密度投影等后处理技术诊断冠状动脉狭窄,冠状动脉造影作为对比标准。结果 256排CTA发现107段冠状动脉被诊断为阻塞性冠心病存在于102例患者中。基于血管段落分析,256排CTA对诊断阻塞性冠心病的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95.5%、97.0%、80.5%和99.4%,基于患者分析,256排CT对诊断阻塞性冠心病的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100.0%、71.6%、87.1%和100.0%。前瞻性门控扫描和回顾性门控扫描对患者的辐射剂量[(4.2±0.5)m Sv和(13.8±3.5)m Sv]比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 256排CT血管造影对诊断阻塞性冠心病有较高的准确性,且采用不同的扫描方式可以降低患者的辐射剂量。
作者 吕军
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2015年第14期62-64,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2014, 129(3):399-410.
  • 2Arbab-Zadeh A, Texter J, Ostbye KM, et al. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard. Heart, 2010, 96(17): 1358-1363.
  • 3Topoi EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation, 1995, 92(8):2333-2342.
  • 4Kimura B J, Bhargava V, DeMaria AN. Value and limitations of intra-vaseular ultrasound imaging in characterizing coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Am Heart J, 1995, 130(2):386-396.
  • 5Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation, 1975, 51 (4 SuppI):5-40.
  • 6Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Reusing B], et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet, 2001, 357(9256):599- 603.
  • 7孙宏亮,任安,徐妍妍,王武.256层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影对比分析[J].临床放射学杂志,2011,30(12):1753-1757. 被引量:32

二级参考文献11

  • 1王锡明,武乐斌,李振家,柳澄,陈海松.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉造影中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1201-1204. 被引量:150
  • 2Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell W, et al. Coronary arteries : diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-meta-analysis. Radiology,2007,245:720.
  • 3Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med ,2008,359:2324.
  • 4Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardi- ovascular Surgery. American Heart Association. Circulation, 1975, 51:5.
  • 5Carrigan TP,Nair D, Schoenhagen P, et al. Prognostic utility of 64- slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J,2009,30:362.
  • 6de Graal FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row muhidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J,2010,31 : 1908.
  • 7Prat-Gonzalez S, Sanz J, Garcia M. Cardiac CT : indications and limitations. J Nucl Med Technol,2008,36 : 18.
  • 8Voms S. What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2009,3:67.
  • 9Chao SP, Law WY, Kuo C J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J,2010,31 : 1916.
  • 10Weigold WG, Olszewski ME, Walker MJ. Low-dose prospective gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2009,25:217.

共引文献31

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部