期刊文献+

如何解释语言的“功能” 被引量:2

How to explain the “function” of language
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言学研究中的形式主义学派与功能主义学派自上世纪末以来开始展开对话,但双方误解依旧。本文基于心智哲学视角,通过分析功能主义在解释语言等心智现象时面临的困境,论证了功能主义语言学的解释局限。论文进一步提出应区分语言功能解释的两个不同层面:常识与科学,这两者分别对应于语言研究中的功能主义与形式主义;两者在研究中彼此自主,却又互为补充,共同构成了对语言生物功能的解释。 Dialogues have appeared between formalists and functionalists in linguistic studies since the end of last century, yet misunderstandings still exist. From the perspective of philosophy of mind, this paper discusses the predicament in mind explanation and reveals the limitation of functionalist explanation in linguistics.It further posits that explanations of language generally fall into two layers: common sense explanation and scientific explanation, corresponding to functionalism and formalism in linguistic study respectively. Despite the fact that the two schools of research are autonomous to each other, the so-called functionalist-formalist dichotomy, is in fact a continuum, both contributing to an integrated account of natural language as a bio logical object.
作者 胡朋志
机构地区 宁波工程学院
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期327-336,437,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划"基于主体过程认知的翻译自然化研究(2013QN049)"的部分研究成果
关键词 语言功能 功能主义 形式主义 解释 the function of language functionalism formalism explanation
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Chomsky, N. 2003. "Reply to Egan" [A]. In L. M. Antomy & N. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics [ C ]. Blackwell: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 268-273.
  • 2Croft, W. 1998. What (some) functionalists can learn from (some) formalists [A]. In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan & K. Wheatley (eds.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87-110.
  • 3Di Sciullo, A. M. & E. Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 4Ducrut, O. & T. Todorov. 1972. Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language [Z]. London: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • 5Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought [M ]. Cambridge, Mass. :Harvard University Press.
  • 6Glennan, S. 2002. Rethinking mechanistic explanation [J]. Philosophy of Science 69: 342-352.
  • 7Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Triviality arguments against functionalism [J]. Philosophy Studies 145: 273-295.
  • 8Jackendoff, R. S. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the Lexicon [J]. Language 51 : 639-67.
  • 9Lyons, J. 1981. Language and Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Mart, D. 1982. Vision [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

二级参考文献1

共引文献75

同被引文献1

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部