中国学生英语高频程式语的视觉和听觉加工优势研究被引量：13

A study of visual and auditory processing advantages of English high-frequency formulas by Chinese EFL learners

导出

摘要本文使用E-Prime编程的"视觉/听觉在线语法判断任务"及"视觉/听觉在线朗读录音任务"四个实验,从视觉和听觉、理解和产出的视角,考察了133名中国中级英语水平者对英语高频程式语的加工优势。研究主要发现:1)四个实验都一致支持程式语的"加工优势假说";2)听者对高频程式语具备加工优势,填补了以往听觉加工优势研究中支撑证据的空白;3)随着语块频数递增,反应时和朗读时皆呈现由慢到快的连续体模式,表明加工优势呈连续体模式。研究结果体现了基于使用的语言观。本文为我国二语教学中要注重高频程式语提供了启示。 The present study intends to investigate the processing advantages of English high-frequency formulas.To this end, four experiments, 'visual/auditory online grammaticality judgment task' and 'visual/auditory online reading aloud and recording task ' are conducted on 133 Chinese Upper Intermediate EFL learners from the perspectives of vision/hearing and comprehension/production through E-Prime. The major findings are:(1) all the four experiments provide consistent evidence to support the hypothesis that formulas enjoy a processing advantage and,(2) hearers also benefit from this processing advantage, thereby filling the blank with supportive evidence in auditory processing.(3) higher-frequency formulas are read faster than lower-frequency ones,, which probably indicates a continuum of processing advantages. The results are in line with Usage-based Linguistics. The study also offers pedagogical implications to attach importance to highfrequency formulas in Chinese EFL teaching.

作者钟志英

机构地区华南农业大学

出处《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期396-406,439,共11页 Modern Foreign Languages

基金广东省教育科研"十二五"规划研究项目"二语学习者高频程式语的心理表征研究"(2013JK024) 国家社会科学基金项目"从二语歧义加工角度看中国英语学习者英语能力的发展"(11BYY036)的部分成果

关键词程式语加工优势视觉听觉 formulas processing advantages visual auditory

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Arnon, I. & N. Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 62( 1 ) : 67-82.
2Arnon, I. & P. U. Cohen. 2013. More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration [J]. Language and Speech 56(3): 257-264.
3Barlow, M. & S. Kemmer. 2000. Usage-based Models of Language [M]. Stanford: CSLI.
4Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad & E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Harlow: Longman.
5Bod, R. 2000. The storage vs. computation of three-word sentences [P]. Presented at AMLaP. Leiden, the Netherlands: University of Leiden.
6Bod, R. 2001. Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences [P]. Presented at CUNY. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
7Bybee, J. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition [J]. Language 82 (4) : 711- 733.
8Conklin K. & C. Schmitt. 2012. The processing of formulaic language [J]. Annual Review of Applied Lingu&tics 32 : 45-61.
9Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2) : 143-188.
10Ellis, N. C. & T. Cadiemo. 2009. Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section [J]. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 111-139.