A Study into Students' Views on Guided Peer Feedback in Group Work 被引量：3

关于小组活动中学生对有指导同伴反馈的看法研究（英文）

导出

摘要 Peer feedback is a key to the quality of group work in foreign language classrooms. In order to better understand the use of peer feedback in spoken English, a ten-week study was conducted by combining peer feedback with group work. Based on Scaffolding Instruction of Constructivism, this study chose three different tools - a checklist, a qualitative feedback sheet and a grading sheet, to guide peer feedback. A questionnaire survey and three interviews were adopted to investigate the students＇ views and attitude toward guided peer feedback. We found：（1） Guided peer feedback plays a positive role in improving the quality of group work and its three forms were positively received by the participants; （2） Among the three tools - the checklist, the qualitative feedback sheet and the grading sheet, the grading sheet was most welcomed; （3） Only by designing the appropriate peer feedback forms and the tasks at the same time, could peer feedback achieve good results. 同伴反馈是影响外语课上小组活动质量的重要因素。为了更好地了解同伴反馈在学生口语学习中的应用情况,作者在大学英语口语课上进行了为期十周的实验,在小组活动设计的同时设计同伴反馈任务。本研究以建构主义中的支架理论为导向,选用了检查表、质性评价表和打分表三种不同的工具来指导同伴反馈,并采用问卷和访谈结合的方法,调查了学生对有指导反馈的看法和态度。研究得出了以下结果 :1)有指导的同伴反馈在提高小组活动质量方面有积极的作用。同伴反馈的三种形式都得到了学生的认可。2)三种形式中打分表受欢迎程度最高。3)只有同时设计好同伴反馈与小组活动任务,同伴反馈才能取得好效果。

作者谢晶晶穆凤英

机构地区江苏师范大学科文学院江苏师范大学外国语学院

出处《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2015年第2期188-203,246,247,共18页 中国应用语言学（英文）

基金 supported by Ministry of Education(Project No:11YJA740065)

关键词 guided peer feedback group work students＇ views 有指导同伴反馈小组活动学生看法

分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Carson, ]., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perception of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
2De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Berings, D. (2010). Peer assessment of oral presentation skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1776-1780.
3Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
4Gredler, M. E. (2005). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
5Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38.
6Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81- 112.
7Hui, T. M. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33, 293-308.
8Jan, w. S., Susanne, N., & Katrin, D. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291-303.
9Li, D. L. (2011). Scaffolding in second language learning of target forms in peer information. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 107-126.
10Liu, 1-, & Hansen, I. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.