期刊文献+

慈善捐赠、广告营销与企业绩效考虑行业竞争因素 被引量:9

Corporate Philanthropy,Marketing Activities and Firm Performance:Considering Industry Competition as a Boundary Condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于消费者视角,利用2007~2012年我国沪深两市A股上市公司的数据,实证检验了在考虑行业竞争的条件下,慈善捐赠行为对广告营销活动与企业销售增长之间关系的影响机制。研究发现,广告营销投入、慈善捐赠水平和行业竞争程度之间的三项交互作用显著。这一结论表明,对于那些在激烈竞争行业环境中运营的企业来说,慈善捐赠水平高而非低时,广告营销投入对企业销售增长的正向影响更强,因此,与处于弱竞争行业的企业相比,处于强竞争行业的企业更应充分利用好慈善捐赠在改善传统营销方式市场效果方面的杠杆作用。 From the consumers" perspective, this study empirically examines how and under which condition corporate philanthropy moderates the link of marketing activities and firm sales growth, using data on Chinese A-share listed firms throughout the years from 2007 to 2012. The authors find that the three-way interactions among advertising intensity, corporate philanthropy and industry competition level have significant relationships with firm sales growth, indicating that for firms operating in highly competitive industries, when the level of philanthropic giving is high versus low, advertising intensity has a stronger positive impact on sales performance. Thus, compared with firms in less competitive industries, intensely competing firms should better lever age philanthropic giving to increase the impact of marketing on sales.
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《财经理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期107-112,共6页 The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71272108) 国家自然科学基金项目(71072038)
关键词 慈善捐赠 广告投入 行业竞争程度 企业销售增长 三项交互 Philanthropic giving Advertising Industry competitive level Sales growthThree-way interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Schuler D,Cording M. A corporate social performance-corpo-rate financial performance behavioral model for consumers [J].Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3) : 540558.
  • 2Porter M,Kramer M. The competitive advantage of corporatephilanthropy [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002 , 80(12) : 56-69.
  • 3Orlitzky M, Schmidt S’ L Rynes. Corporate social and financialperformance: a meta-analysis [J]. Organization Studies. 2003,24(3): 403-441.
  • 4杜兴强,杜颖洁.公益性捐赠、会计业绩与市场绩效:基于汶川大地震的经验证据[J].当代财经,2010(2):113-122. 被引量:55
  • 5Wang H,Choi J,Li J. Too little or too much untangling the re-lationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financialperformance [J], Organization Science, 2008,19(1): 142 -159.
  • 6Handelman J M, Arnold S J. The role of marketing actionswith a social dimension : appeals to the institutional environment[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1999,63(3) ; 33 - 48.
  • 7Berens G, van Riel C B M, Van Rekom J. The CSR -qualitytrade-off: when can corporate social responsibility and corporateability compensate each other. [J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2007’ 74(3): 233-252.
  • 8Godfrey Paul C. The relationship between corporate philan-thropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005,30(4): 777 -798.
  • 9Fisman R,Heal G, Nair V B. A model of corporate philan-thropy [R]. Working Paper, 2006.
  • 10Neville B A,Bell S J, Menguc B. Corporate reputation,stake-holders and the social performance-financial performance rela-tionship [J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2005,39(9 -10): 1184-1198.

二级参考文献44

  • 1钟宏武.企业捐赠作用的综合解析[J].中国工业经济,2007(2):75-83. 被引量:144
  • 2白重恩,刘俏,陆洲,宋敏,张俊喜.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):81-91. 被引量:1329
  • 3王跃堂,赵子夜,魏晓雁.董事会的独立性是否影响公司绩效?[J].经济研究,2006,41(5):62-73. 被引量:405
  • 4夏立军,陈信元.市场化进程、国企改革策略与公司治理结构的内生决定[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):82-95. 被引量:348
  • 5Preston, Lee E., and O'Bannon, Douglas P.. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis[J]. Business and Society, 1997, 36 (4): 419-429.
  • 6Freeman, R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Pitman Publishing Inc, 1984.
  • 7Ruf, Bernadette M., Muralidhar, Krishnamurty, Brown, Robert M., Janney, Jay J., and Paul, Karen. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2001, 32(2): 143-156.
  • 8Brammer, S., and Millington, A.. Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 61: 9-44,.
  • 9Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R..The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80: 57-68.
  • 10Deshpande, S., & Hithon, J. C. Cause-related marketing ads in the light of negative news [J]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2002, 79 : 905-926.

共引文献74

同被引文献195

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部