输尿管上段结石的两种治疗方法疗效及并发症的比较

Comparison of Two Methods in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi and Complications

目的输尿管上段结石的两种治疗方法疗效及并发症的比较。方法选取我院共收治100例输尿管结石患者,其中,54例患者实施经输尿管镜碎石术,将其记为对照组,其余46例患者则应用经皮肾镜碎石术,将其记为观察组。结果两组患者的碎石清除率和手术治疗的有效率比较,观察组均要明显高于对照组患者,比较差异有显著性的统计学的意义(P<0.05)。结论在对输尿管结石患者进行治疗时,经皮肾镜的手术方式的治疗效果更佳,值得推广。

Objective To compare the two methods in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and complications. Methods In our hospital treated a total of 100 cases of ureteral calculi patients, among them, 54 cases underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy, the notes for the control group, the other 46 patients with percutaneous nephrolithotomy, wil be recorded as observation group.ResultsThe two groups of patients with operation treatment for stone clearance rate and the efficiency comparison, observation group were significantly higher than the patients in the control group, there was statisticaly significant difference （P〈 0.05） and the significance.Conclusion In the treatment of ureteral calculi patients, by way of the operation of percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment effect is better, is worthy of promotion.