三乙醇胺对头面部烧伤的治疗效果分析

Therapeutic Effect analysis of Triethanolamine Adversary Facial Burns

目的分析研究三乙醇胺治疗头面部烧伤患者的临床疗效。方法随机选取我院烧伤科2012年1月至2014年1月收治的100例头面部烧伤患者为研究对象。根据烧伤部位将其分为左半侧组和右半侧组,每组50例。左半侧组采用三乙醇胺乳膏进行治疗,右半侧组采用磺胺嘧啶银乳膏进行治疗。对比两侧创面愈合时间及不良反映情况。结果两组患者用药后均伴有不同程度的疼痛、渗出、肿胀,而采用三乙醇胺乳膏的左半侧组其疼痛、渗出、肿胀明显轻于右半侧组;两组创面细菌培养阳性率对比,无显著差异(P>0.05),无统计学意义;左半侧组浅Ⅱ度患者用要药后(7、14 d)、深Ⅱ度患者要药后(21、28 d)、完全愈合时间均明显短于右半侧组,(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论三乙醇胺治疗头面部烧伤患者临床不良反映较轻,愈合时间快,能有效促进患者早日康复,值得推广应用。

Objective To study the clinical curative effect of patients with facial burn. Methods Randomly selected from our hospital acute during January 2012 to January 2014 were 100 cases of facial burn patients as the research object. According to the burned area will be divided into the left side and right side group, 50 cases each. One group was treated with triethanolamine cream, a semi-mohican right side group treated by sulfadiazine silver cream. Comparison on both sides of the wound healing time and bad. Results Two groups of patients after all with varying degrees of pain, seepage, swelling, and use of triethanolamine cream its pain, seepage, swelling semi-mohican group was obviously lighter than right side group; two groups of wound germiculture positive contrast, no significant difference（P〈0.05）, no statistical significance; group of people with shallow Ⅱ degrees to a semi-mohican medicine after（7 d, 14 d）, deep Ⅱ degree of patients to drugs（21 d and 28 d） after, full healing time were significantly shorter than the right side group,（P〈0.05）, the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion Triethanolamine treatment head facial burn patients clinical adverse reflect lighter, faster healing time, can effectively promote the patient recover at an early date, is worthy of popularization and application.