期刊文献+

国内双重差分法的研究现状与潜在问题 被引量:286

Research Status and Potential Problems of Differences-in-differences Method in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在国内政策效果评估领域,基于自然实验的双重差分法是应用最广的研究工具,并在近年呈现加速发展的趋势。但通过归纳双重差分法的基本应用条件与国内研究现状,本文发现部分研究出现了内生性、控制组受影响、样本异质性等问题。其中尤以内生性问题较为严重,甚至使部分研究产生了一定的缺陷,所谓的自然实验往往难以成立。本文根据实验理论与相关理论基础,对国内主要研究成果进行分类与评述,并针对所发现的问题提出改良办法。 Differences-in-differences method (DID) based on the natural experiment is the most widely used research tool in the academic literature about effect of policy, and the trend of domestic literatures using DID method has been increasing rapidly in recent years. However, through concluding the basic application conditions and domestic research actuality of DID method, this paper finds that domestic research literatures are intermingled with the good and bad, and there are some serious problems, such as the endogeneity problem, control group related and sample heterogeneity. Particularly, the problem of endogeneity is more serious, even making the academic research shows some certain defect, in which the hypothesis of natural experiment is often difficult to establish. According to related experimental research and theoretical study abroad, we classify and comment the major domestic research literatures using DID method, and raise improvement measures for the potential problems identified.
作者 陈林 伍海军
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期133-148,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71203078 71333007 41371174) 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(14JZD021) 国家社会科学基金项目(13CJL065) 广东产业发展粤港澳台区域合作研究中心 暨南大学"跨越计划"的资助
关键词 双重差分 自然实验 准实验 内生性问题 Differences-in-Differences Method Natural Experiment Quasi-experiment Endogeneity Problem
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Asch S: F_ , 1958, Interpersonal Influence l-A:, in Eleanor Maccoby, Theodore Newcomb, Eugene Hartley (eds), Reading in Social Psychology EM], New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Publishing.
  • 2Ashenfelter Orley C. , 1978, Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings [J], Re- view of Economics and Statistics, 60 (1), 47:57.
  • 3Ashenfelter Orley C. , David Card, 1985, Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Esti- mate the EfJect of Training Programs [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, 67 (4), 648:660.
  • 4Bertrand Marianne, Esther Du{lo, Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004, How Much Should We Trust Differences in-DiJferences Estimates? [J:, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (1), 249:275.
  • 5Card David, Alan B. Krueger, 1994, Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania [J:, American Economic Review, 84 (4), 772-793.
  • 6Dinardo J., 2008, Natural Ezperiments and Quasi-natural Experiments : A:, in Steven N. Durlau{, E. Lawrence (eds), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics [M:, London: Palgrave Macmil- lan Publishing.
  • 7Heckman James, Hidehiko Ichimura, Jeffrey Smith, Petra Todd, 1998, Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data [J], Econometrica, 66 (5), 1017:1098.
  • 8Heckman James, R. Jr. Robb, 1985, Altenative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interven- tions [A], in J. Heckman, B. Singer (eds), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data IMp, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Publishing.
  • 9Imbens Guido, Jeffrey Wooldridge, 2007, What's New in Econometrics? [-C:, NBER Summer In- stitute Minicourse.
  • 10Manski C. F. , 1989, Anatomyof Selection Problem [J], Journal of Human Resources, 24 (3), 341:360.

二级参考文献783

共引文献3223

同被引文献4062

引证文献286

二级引证文献2916

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部