期刊文献+

2种粉体气力输送系统的对比选型 被引量:8

Analysis and Selection of Two Kinds of Pneumatic Conveying System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决某工程项目中粉煤灰输送系统的选型问题,从设备投资和运行电耗方面对仓泵输送系统和罗茨风机输送系统进行对比分析。结果表明,对于6个单只最大量为911 kg/h的卸灰口,输送距离为200 m的输送系统而言,仓泵输送系统比罗茨风机输送系统设备初投资多33.22万元,运行电费每年节省14.2万元,超出部分投资静态回收期为2.34 a。 To solve the selection problem of the fly ash conveying system in a certain project, the pneumatic conveying systems by silo pump and roots blower were compared and analyzed in items of equipment investment and power consumption. The results show that for 6 fly ash unloading ports with maximum discharge of 911 kg/h per port and the conveying system with conveying distance of 200 m, the equipment investment of the conveying system by silo pump is 332 200 yuan more than that by roots blower. The former can save running electricity charges of 142 000 yuan per year. The excess investments static investment period is 2.34 a.
作者 张鑫
出处 《中国粉体技术》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第3期100-102,共3页 China Powder Science and Technology
基金 中国煤炭科工集团有限公司科技创新基金青年基金项目 编号:2013QN035 煤炭科学技术研究院科技发展基金项目 编号:2014CX03
关键词 粉体 气力输送 仓泵 风机 powder pneumatic conveying silo pump blower
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

  • 1MAINWARING N J.REED A R.Permeability and air retention characteristies of bulk solids materials in relation to modes of dense phase pneumatic conveying[J].Bulk Solids Handling,1987,7(3):415-425.
  • 2GELDART D,LING S J.Dense phase conveying of fine coal at high total pressures[J].Powder Technology,1990,62:243-252.
  • 3TOMITA.Pneumatic slug conveying in a horizontal pipeline[J].Powder Technology,1997,5(13):229-233.
  • 4DHODAPKAR,PLASYNSKI S L,KLINZING G E.Numerical simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow in a vertical pipe[J].Powder Technology,1994,81:432-436.
  • 5LEVY.Two-fliud approach for plug flow simulation in horizontal pneumatics conveying[J].Powder technology,2000,112:263-272.
  • 6林江.气力输送系统中加速区气固两相流动特性的研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(7):893-898. 被引量:26

共引文献42

同被引文献94

引证文献8

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部