期刊文献+

“立人”与“兴国”:鲁迅早期“个人”观念的内在问题 被引量:4

“Cultivation of People”and“Rejuvenation of the Nation”: the Inner Problems of Lu Xun's Early Ideology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鲁迅在日本时期的文言论文中提出了自己的救亡主张,在"人类之能"、"神思"、"精神"、"意力"、"心声"、"内曜"、"白心"、"进化"等概念系统中,系统地表达了以"立人"为动机的"个人"观念,其"个人"以超越性"精神"为内涵,以落实于生命力的"意力"为根基,这一"个人"观念有着进化论与德国主观主义哲学的显著影响,同时又受传统思维方式的内在制约,使其"个人"想象是本然自足的。鲁迅将中国现代转型的问题意识深刻地推进到文明基础的"自我"——"个人"层面,形成一个深度视点,但是,本然自足的"个人"想象缺少超越性、普遍性的理性背景,不仅制约了其对西方资源背后理性主义传统的发现,也使其"立人"到"兴国"的设计存在难以解决的潜在问题。 Lu Xun put forward his personal advocacy for "saving the nation" in papers written in classical Chinese characters during his stay in Japan. Through concepts like "human capacity", "spiritual thinking", "spirit", "will power", "inner voice", "intemal cultivation", "internal cleansing" and "evolution", Lu Xun had systematically discussed "individuality" as the base for "cultivation of people". This "individuality" has the power of "spiritual transcendence", thus implementing the "meaning" of life as the foundation. The con- cept of "individuality" was obviously the consequence of the impact of evolution theory and German subjec- tive philosophy but also demonstrated an inner constraint born of traditional Chinese philosophy assuming this imagined "individuality" as a natural product of self-sufficiency. Lu Xun had embodied the ideological issue of China' s transformation in the concept of "individuality" which demands civilization as its founda- tion; however, this "individuality" as the natural result of self-sufficiency lacks the rationality of spiritual transcendence and universality, which has not only restricted further exploration of traditional Western ratio- nalism but also made the ideal of "cultivation of people" and "rejuvenation of the nation" almost impossible to realize.
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期1-6,共6页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 鲁迅 立人 兴国 “个人”观念 国民性批判 Lu Xun cultivation of people rejuvenation of the nation individuality criticism of nationalcharacter
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1鲁迅.文化偏至论[M]∥鲁迅全集.北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
  • 2鲁迅.摩罗诗力说[M].//鲁迅全集:第1卷.北京:人民文学出版社,1981.71.
  • 3章太炎.馗书·[M]//章太炎全集(三).上海:上海人民出版社,1984:目录页第六.
  • 4鲁迅.集外集拾遗补编·破恶声论[M]//鲁迅全集(第8卷).北京:人民文学出版社,1981:33.
  • 5许寿裳.亡友鲁迅印象记;怀亡友鲁迅[M]//北京鲁迅博物馆,鲁迅研究室,《月刊》编辑室.编.鲁迅回忆录:专著上.北京:北京出版社,1999:226,443.
  • 6汪卫东.鲁迅前期文本中的“个人”观念[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2006.
  • 7汪卫东.鲁迅国民性批判的内在逻辑系统[J].鲁迅研究月刊,1999(7):5-12. 被引量:13
  • 8陈荣捷.王阳明传习录详注集评·答聂文蔚[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1984:259.
  • 9汪卫东.能否到“人”为止?——对20世纪中国人道主义文学思潮的反思[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010,26(1):1-8. 被引量:3

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘再复.论文学的主体性[J].文学评论,1985(6):11-26. 被引量:374
  • 2俞建章.论当代文学创作中的人道主义潮流——对三年文学创作的回顾与思考[J].文学评论,1981(1):22-33. 被引量:20
  • 3胡适.中国新文学大系·建设理论集·导言.胡适全集:第12卷[M].安徽:安徽教育出版社,2003,296.
  • 4梁实秋.文学是有阶级性的吗?.新月,.
  • 5鲁迅.文学的阶级性.鲁迅全集[M].北京:人民文学出版社1981.
  • 6鲁迅.“硬译”与“文学的阶级性”.鲁迅全集[M].北京:人民文学出版社1981.
  • 7康德.哲学与建立主体性论纲[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
  • 8性格组合论[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1986.
  • 9周作人.人的文学.新青年,1918.
  • 10.礼记[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988..

共引文献59

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部