期刊文献+

国际视野中的托幼机构教育质量评估

The Educational Quality Evaluation for Nursery-kindergartens in the International Perspectives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对托幼机构教育质量的评估是一个尚未得到很好解决的问题。从国际范围看,影响较大的有"相对评估""结构—过程性评估"这两种学说。"相对评估"总结出了一些托幼机构教育评估的要素。"结构—过程性评估"则涉及结构性、过程性、联系性三个因素。结构性因素涉及班级规模大小、人员配置、教师培养质量、照管的稳定性、健康与安全、环境创设、照管过程的结构化等;过程性因素主要是教师和幼儿的相互作用,结构性因素和过程性因素相互影响;联系性因素尚无方案化的评估模式,主要可能涉及领导者的领导风格、托幼机构的工作气氛、教职工的薪酬、工作条件、托幼机构的承办者以及政府对托幼机构的管理办法等。 The evaluation of the educational quality to the nursery-kindergartens is a problem that remains to be solved.Viewed from the international scope,"relative evaluation" and "structure-process evaluation" are the most influential two evaluation theories."Relative evaluation" sums up some important factors for the evaluation of nursery-kindergartens while the "structure-process evaluation" relates to the three factors of structure,process and association.The structure factors relates to the size of classes,staff allocation,teachers training quality,stable childcare,health and safety,environment facilities and structure-based childcare process.The process factors are mainly focused on the interaction between teachers and children.The structure factors and the process factors are inter-influential.The association factors still have no evaluation model,which may mainly relate to the leaders' leading styles,the working atmosphere of the nursery-kindergartens,teachers' salary,working condition,the managing approaches of the runners of nursery-kindergartens and the government,etc.
作者 张虹 胡亿军
出处 《湖州师范学院学报》 2015年第6期83-92,共10页 Journal of Huzhou University
关键词 托幼机构 教育质量 评估 相对评估 结构—过程性评估 childcare facilities education quality evaluation relative evaluation structure-process evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Dahlberg G. ,Asen G. Evaluation and Regulation: a Question of Empowerment,in: P. Moss & A. Pence (eds) ; Valu- ing Quality in Early Childhood Services. London: Paul Chapman, 1994:157 - 171.
  • 2Pascal C & Bertram T. Effective Early Learning. Case Studies in Improvement, Hodder & Stoughton, London,1997.
  • 3NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) ,Washington DC, 1991.
  • 4Pascal C. ,Bertram T. Exploring definitions of quality for children 3 -5 in practice. In.. Laevers, F. assessing quality in early childhood education. Leuven: Leuven University Press 1994:103- 109.).
  • 5Europaisches Netzwerk Kinderbetreuung. Qualit/itsziele in Einrichtungen fur kleine Kinder. zehnj/ihriges Aktionsprogramm. Briissel: Europ/iische Kommission, 1996. (ed.): Defining and Vorschlage for ein.
  • 6Wassilios E. Fthenakis, Trend and perspectives in early childhood education: Reconceptualising early childhood educa- tion from an international point of view,2004.
  • 7Whitebook m, Howes C& Phillips D A.Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Final report of the National Child care Staffing Study,1990.
  • 8Cohen N E& Pompa D.Multieultural Perspectives on quality in early care and education: Culturally specific practices and universal outcomes. New Haven, Corm: Quality 2000, Yale University, 1994.
  • 9Helburn S W. (ed.) Cost, quality and child outcomes in child care centres.Technical report, Denver, Colorado : Depart- ment of Economics, Center for Research in Economics and Social Policy, University of Colorado at Denver, 1995.
  • 10Kontos S& Fiene R. Quality, compliance with regulations and children's development: The Pennsylvania Study.In D. Phillipps: Quality in child care: What does the research tell us Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1987 : 57 - 79.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部