期刊文献+

我国环境修复基金来源途径刍议——以美国超级基金制度为视角 被引量:20

The Sources of Funds on China's Environmental Remediation:From the Perspective of the U. S. Superfund
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行立法对环境修复费用的来源没有明确且具体之规定,造成环境修复过程中费用的来源存在困境。以美国超级基金制度为分析视角,借鉴其有关资金来源保障措施的立法经验,有利于为建立适合我国国情的环境修复基金来源途径提出具有建设性的立法构想。 The unclear and unspecific provisions on sources of environmental remediation funds in existing laws cause difficulties in raising the money during the recovery of environment. Based on the system of the U. S. Superfund, the thesis is aimed at using the legislative experience on protective methods of sources of envi- ronmental remediation funds to put forward a constructive design of legislation for our nation' s sources of funds in protecting environment.
机构地区 河海大学法学院
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2015年第3期68-73,共6页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 环境修复费用 费用来源 美国超级基金制度 立法构想 environmental remediation costs the sources of costs the U.S. superfund legislative design
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1H. French Brown. Rebirth of CERCLA 107 Contri- bution Actions: New Life for PRPs That Conduct Voluntary Cleanups after Avail[ J]. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, 2007, (14) :212 -245.
  • 2Farah Rosenberger. Brownfields Programs and Tax Incentives Are Stimulating the Redevelopment of Brownfields [ J ]. Southeastern Environmental Law Journal, 2005, (13) :149.
  • 3李挚萍.环境修复法律制度探析[J].法学评论,2013,31(2):103-109. 被引量:81
  • 4陈雅琼.2011年上市公司十大环保事件[N].证券日报,2011-12-20(C01).
  • 5于琳.美国的生态税收政策[N].学习时报,2006-10-02(002).
  • 6王曦,胡苑.美国的污染治理超级基金制度[J].环境保护,2007,35(05B):64-67. 被引量:48
  • 7Jennifer R. Yelin. Retroactivity Revisited : A Criti- cal Appraisal of CERCLA "s Retroactive Liability Scheme in Light of Landgraf v. USI Film Products and Eastern Enterpri- ses v. Apfel [ J ]. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 1999, (8) :94.

二级参考文献35

  • 1高翔云,汤志云,李建和,王力.国内土壤环境污染现状与防治措施[J].江苏环境科技,2006,19(2):52-55. 被引量:52
  • 2《“共有产权下物业费还是个人交”--起草人申卫星强调住房保障法“共有产权”仍在讨论中.住户可以全部买下全部产权》,载《新京报》,2010年2月5日.
  • 3Mark Haggerty,Stephanie A Welcomer.Superfund:The ascendance of enabling myths.Journal of Economic Issues,2003,(2):451-459.
  • 4Dianne Rahm.Controversial Cleanup:Superfund and the Implementation of U.S.Hazardous Waste Policy.Policy Studies Journal,1998,(4):719-734.
  • 5Douglas W.McNiel,Andrew W.Foshee.Superfund Financing Alternatives.Policy Studies Review,1988,(4):751-760.
  • 6Public Law Number 96-510.December 11,1980.
  • 7United States.Environmental Protection Agency.Superfund:Building on the Past,Looking to the Future120-Day Study.April 22,2004.
  • 8Public Law Number 99-499,Sec516,Sec 517.
  • 9David Brazell,Geraldine Gerardi.Issues In Financing the Superfund.National Tax Journal.1994,(3):677-688.
  • 10《“再工业化”拯救美国?》,《时代周刊》2010年7月19日,C07版.

共引文献124

同被引文献181

引证文献20

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部