期刊文献+

Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的中期疗效分析 被引量:3

Medium-term Curative Effect of Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stabilization System for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Degenerative Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效,并结合文献探讨其潜在的问题。方法2009~2011年收治的60例腰椎退行性疾病患者,其中男性36例,女性24例,平均年龄43.2岁,32例以Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统进行治疗(Wallis组),28例采用髓核摘除加脊柱内固定术(内固定组)。所有患者术前及术后进行脊髓功能评分(JOA)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),同时测量病变节段及邻近节段手术前后的活动范围(ROM)和椎间高度(DH)。结果所有患者随访3~5年(平均38.3个月)。Wallis组JOA评分术前(13.3±0.3)分,术后(21.9±4.3)分;VAS评分术前(6.3±2.5)分,术后(1.6±0.4)分。内固定组JOA评分术前(12.8±0.5)分,术后(19.8±2.9)分;VAS评分术前(7.3±0.5)分,术后(1.8±0.6)分。术前两组患者手术及邻近节段DH及ROM无统计学差异。末次随访时内固定组手术节段ROM为0°,Wallis组手术节段ROM为(7.5±2.7)°,两组差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.01);内固定组上端邻近节段ROM明显增加,大于Wallis组(P〈0.01),说明Wallis组较好地保留了邻近节段运动功能。所有患者均未出现脑脊液漏、感染、棘突骨折、神经损伤、椎间盘突出复发、植入物移位等并发症,除2例患者术后3~5年腰痛复发外(Wallis组),其余症状均无复发。结论 Wallis棘突间动态稳定系统作为一种新的脊柱非融合技术,克服了传统的脊柱融合术的缺陷,改善症状明显,治疗效果肯定,同时也存在一些潜在的问题需要解决。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of the Wallis dynamic stabilization system for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disorders,and discuss the potential problems by reviewing literatures.Methods A total of 60 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were treated with the Wallis system from 2009 to 2011,including 36 males and 24 females,with an average age of 43.2years.Thirty-two patients were treated with Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization(Wallis group)and the other28 patients with removal of nucleus pulposus and spinal implant operation(internal fixation group).The clinical efficacy was evaluated with spinal cord function score(JOA)and the visual analogue scale(VAS)before and after operation.The range of motion(ROM)and disc height(DH)of diseased segments and upper or lower adjacent segments were measured before and after operation.Results All the patients were followed up for 3to 5years with an average of 38.3months.In the Wallis group,JOA score was(13.3±0.3)before the operation and(21.9±4.3)after the operation;VAS score was(6.3±2.5)before surgery,and(1.6±0.4)after surgery.In the internal fixation group,JOA score was(12.8±0.5)before surgery,and(19.8±2.9)after surgery;preoperative VAS score was(7.3±0.5)and postoperative VAS score was(1.8±0.6).There was no significant difference in preoperative ROM and DH in diseased segments and adjacent segments between the two groups.The ROM of the fixed segments was reduced to 0°in last follow-up in the internal fixation group,while it was(7.5±2.7)°in Wallis group,with the difference being statistically significant(P〈0.01).The ROM of the upper adjacent segments was increased significantly in internal fixation group,significantly higher than that in Wallis group(P〈0.01),which indicated that the Wallis system is superior to the internal fixation in terms of retaining motor function of adjacent segments.No patient experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage,postoperative infection,spinous process fracture,nerve damage,recurrent disc herniation,implant displacement and other complications,and there was no recurrence of symptoms except 2cases of postoperative low back pain after 3to 5years in Wallis group.Conclusion Wallis dynamic stabilization system,as a new kind of spinal non-fusion technology,overcomes the defect of traditional spinal fusion,improves symptoms and achieves satisfactory clinical efficacy.However,there are some potential problems that need to be solved.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期322-325,共4页 Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
关键词 腰椎退行性疾病 WALLIS棘突间动态稳定系统 动态固定 疗效 lumbar degenerate disorders Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization dynamic stabilization curativeeffect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1俞兴,徐林,毕连涌,李鹏洋.棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病初期效果分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(23):1786-1788. 被引量:20
  • 2Wilke H J, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanieal effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and in- tradiscal pressure[J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17(8) : 1049-1056.
  • 3Senegas J, Vital J M, Pointillart V, et al. Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device(the Wallis system)with a 13 year mean follow-up[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2009,32(3) : 335-342.
  • 4Wilke H J, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and in tradiscal pressure[J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17(8) :1049-1056.
  • 5双峰,侯树勋.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的临床研究现状[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2013,27(1):110-115. 被引量:23
  • 6Sobottke R, Schluter-Brust K, Kaulhausen T, et al. lnterspl- nous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam)for the treatment o. LSS: is there a correlation between radiologieal parameters and clinical outcome? [J]. Eur Spine J, 2009,18 (10) : 1494- 1 .0B.

二级参考文献46

  • 1俞兴,徐林,毕连涌,曲弋,郑大滨,曹旭.应用纳米晶胶原基骨材料行腰椎后外侧融合初步效果分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(8):586-588. 被引量:19
  • 2迟大明,朱悦.非融合固定在退行性腰椎疾病中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(10):622-625. 被引量:15
  • 3李淳德,于峥嵘,刘宪义,李宏.腰椎内固定融合术后邻近节段退变的影响因素[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(4):246-248. 被引量:38
  • 4Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease fol-lowinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumen-tation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(20): 2253-2257.
  • 5Bambakidis NC, Feiz-Erfan I, Klopfenstein JD, et al Indications forsurgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment. Spine (PhilaPa 1976),2005, 30(16 Suppl): S2-S6.
  • 6Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the per-formance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbarspine. Part 5: correlation between radiographic and functional out-come. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005,2(6): 658-661.
  • 7Stoffel M,Behr M, Reinke A, et al. Pedicle screw-based dynamic sta-bilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system: a pro-spective observation. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2010,152(5): 835-843.
  • 8Min JH, Jang JS, Jung B. et al. The clinical characteristics and risk fac-tors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbarfusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(5): 305-309.
  • 9Park JY, Chin DK, Cho YE. Accelerated L5-Si segment degeneration af-ter spinal fusion on and above Lt-s: minimum 4-year Follow-up results.J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009,45(2): 81-84.
  • 10Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segmentdegeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008,33(15): 1701-1707.

共引文献41

同被引文献49

  • 1卢廷胜,王以进,尹海磊,王淑新,卢建峰,林鹏.半椎板成形术对腰椎抗压强度的影响[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(23):2389-2391. 被引量:6
  • 2卢廷胜,宫岩虎,付廷友,吕则文,蓝朝晖,张伟.半椎板成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(11):877-878. 被引量:2
  • 3宗少晖,王振宇.单侧半椎板“开窗”显微手术切除颈椎椎管内肿瘤[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(7):565-566. 被引量:21
  • 4Yoshihara H. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(9):1788-1796.
  • 5Mo J, Zhang W, Zhong D, et al. Is Preventative Long-Segment Surgery for Multi-Level Spondylolysis Necessary? A Finite Element Analysis Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (2):e0149707.
  • 6Shetty A, Kini AR, Chacko A, et al. Mini posterior lumbar interbody fusion with presacral screw stabilization in early lumbosacral instability. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(3):278-283.
  • 7Uvaraj NR, Bosco A, Gopinath NR. Global Reconstruction for Extensive Destruction in Tuberculosis of the Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacra Junction: A Case Report. Global Spine J. 2015;5(4) e17-21.
  • 8Song JF, Jing ZZ, Chen B, et al. One-stage anterolateral surgical treatment for lumbosacral segment tuberculosis. Int Orthop. 2012;36(2):339-344.
  • 9Qian J, Bao ZH, Li X, et al. Short-Term Therapeutic Efficacy of the Isobar TTL Dynamic Internal Fixation System for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases. Pain Physician. 2016; 19(6):E853-861.
  • 10Kim DK, Lim H, Rim DC, et al. Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Semirigid (WavefleX) and Rigid System for the Lumbar Spine. Korean J Spine. 2016; 13(2):57-62.

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部