吊针疗法治疗面肌痉挛30例

Transfusion Therapy in the Treatment of 60 Cases of Hemifacial Spasm

目的:观察吊针疗法治疗面肌痉挛临床疗效。方法:60例面肌痉挛患者随机分为两组(观察组和对照组),观察组用吊针疗法治疗,对照组用常规针刺治疗,两组治疗前后及治疗结束3个疗程后根据Albert分级量表进行功能分级评分。结果:两组治疗前后Albert分级量表评分比较均有显著性意义(P<0.01),治疗后两组间比较无差异(P>0.05),但在治疗结束1个月后两组疗效比较有非常显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:吊针疗法和常规针刺疗法对面肌痉挛均有较好的治疗效果,但吊针疗法的远期疗效优于常规针刺法。

Objective：To observe the curative effect of infusion therapy on hemifacial spasm.Methods： Randomly divided 60 cases of patients with hemifacial spasm of the inclusion criteria into two groups （ observation group and controled group） , infusion therapy group for the observation group, conventional acupuncture observation group as the controled group.The controled group of two, before the intervention and intervention after 3 courses of treatment, ＇according to the Albert grading scale＇functional grading.Results： The two groups after the intervention according to the Albert rating scale scores were significantly decreased （P〈0.001）, there was no differ-ence between the two groups （P〉0.05）, but at the end of the intervention of the two groups after 3 courses of Albert grading scale than has the difference （P〈0.001）.Conclusion：Intravenous therapy and conventional acupuncture point selection on the intervention effect of hemifacial spasm were good, but the long-term clinical effect of transfusion therapy is better than that of routine acupuncture method.