摘要
罗尔斯试图用充分博弈之后选择的差别原则来回答社会有限资源的分配问题。博弈曲线"OP"的界定在一定程度上对平等权利、效率诉求、自由政府、人道主义等主题都作出了正面回答。但是博弈中的两个正义原则本身并不是制度建设的现实指导。因此在实践中要充分认识到"OP"曲线的局限性。特别是在我国分配正义受到广泛关注的情况下,从正反两个方面认识罗尔斯的正义原则就具有很强的现实意义。
Rawls tries to answer the distributive problem of limited social resources by the difference principle of choice after gaming. The distinction of curve OP gives positive responses to equal rights,efficiency pursuing,free government and humanitarianism. However,the two principles of justice in gaming cannot be the actual guide of system construction. Therefore,the limitation of curve OP should be paid attention in the practice. Especially,in current China,understanding the virtues and defects of Rawls' justice principle has its necessity.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期45-52,156,共8页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
西南政法大学青年项目"中国特色法治话语的当代诠释问题研究"资助
关键词
分配正义
罗尔斯
善
平等
distributive justice
Rawls
good
equality
