期刊文献+

中文版智谋量表信效度分析 被引量:71

Reliability and validity analysis of Chinese Resourcefulness Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:引进并构建具有良好信效度的中文版智谋量表,将该量表用于评估乳腺癌患者,并对其进行信效度检验。方法通过正向翻译、回译、综合、研究小组评议和专家评议5个步骤对智谋量表进行汉化和文化调试,形成中文版智谋量表,采用方便抽样的方法对330例乳腺癌患者进行评估,评价其信效度。结果文化调试后中文版智谋量表内容效度指数为0.90。总量表内部一致性Cronbach′s α系数为0.825,重测信度系数为0.852。每个条目重测信度在0.68~0.82,量表各项目与总分的相关系数在0.40~0.66。反映习得性智谋和社会性智谋两个维度分值的相关系数为0.432。中文版智谋量表探索性因子分析提取到2个因子,可解释80.22%的变异量。结论中文版智谋量表具有较高的信效度,可以作为国内评价乳腺癌患者智谋状况的评价工具。 Objective To investigate the application of Resourcefulness Scale ( RS) and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods By five steps of translation, back-translation, comprehension, group discussion and expert discussion, the RS was translated into Chinese and went on cultural debugging. Totals of 330 patients with breast cancer were randomly selected to evaluate the reliability and validity. Results After translation and cultural debugging, the content reliability was 0. 90. The Cronbach′sαof internal consistency of the scale was 0. 825. The retest reliability was 0. 852. The retest reliability within each item was 0. 68-0. 82. The correlation index between the whole scale and each item were 0. 40-0. 66. The correlation index of reflect learning RS and social RS was 0. 432. The Chinese RS exploratory factor extracted two factors, which could explain 80. 22% variables. Conclusions Chinese RS has a high reliability and validity, so it can serve as an evaluation tool for patients with breast cancer.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2015年第15期1737-1740,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 福建省卫生厅医学创新课题,国家临床重点专科建设项目
关键词 智谋量表 乳腺肿瘤 信度 效度 Resourcefulness scale Breast cancer Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Zauszniewski JA, Lai CY, Tithiphontumrong S. Development and Testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults[J]. J Nurs Measur,2006,14( 1 ) :57458.
  • 2王淑米.精神科护理人员工作压力、智谋、抑郁的相关研究[D].高雄:高雄医学大学护理学院/护理学研究所,2009.
  • 3Bekhet AK, Zauszniewski JA. Theoretical substruction illustrated by the Theory of Learned Resourcefulness [ J ]. Res Theory Nurs Pract ,2008,22 ( 3 ) :205-214.
  • 4Zauszniewski JA, Chung C, Krafcik K. Social cognitive factors in predicting health of elders[J]. W J Nurs Res,2001,23 (5) :490- 503.
  • 5Zauszniewski JA. Resourcefulness: A new middle-range theory. In J, J. Fitzpatrick ( Ed. ) , Encyclopedia of nursing research [ M]. New York: Springer Publishing,2005.
  • 6Bekhet AK, Zauszniewski JA. Resourcefulness, positive cognitions, relocation controllability and relocation adjustment among older people: a cross-sectianal study of cultural differences [ J]. Int J Older People Nuts,2013,8(3 ) :244-252.
  • 7Bekhet AK, Zauszniewski JA, Matel-Anderson DM. Resourcefulness training intervention: assessing critical parameters from relocated older adults' perspectives [ J ]. Issues Ment Health Nurs, 2012, 33 (7) :430-435.
  • 8Lai CY, Zauszniewski JA, Tang TC, et al. Personal beliefs, learned resourcefulness, and adaptive functioning in depressed adults[J]. J Psyehiatr Ment Health Nurs,2014,21 (3) :280-287.
  • 9Zauszniewski JA, Au TY, Musil CM. Resourcefulness training for grandmothers raising grandchildren: is there a need? [ J]. Issues Ment Health Nurs ,2012,33 ( 10 ) :680-686.
  • 10Zauszniewski JA, Musil CM, Au TY. Resourcefulness training for grandmothers: feasibility and acceptability of two methods [ J ]. Issues Ment Health Nurs,2013,34 (6) :435 441.

二级参考文献83

共引文献59

同被引文献570

引证文献71

二级引证文献275

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部