期刊文献+

胸痛患者分诊记录单的应用效果 被引量:8

Application effect of new triage record list on acute chest pain
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:将非创伤性胸痛的分诊标准和SOAPIE分诊方法引入急性胸痛的预检分诊工作,探讨其在急性胸痛预检分诊工作中的应用效果。方法依据SOAPIE分诊方法和非创伤性胸痛的分诊标准自行设计胸痛患者分诊记录单,比较采用常规分诊方法与该分诊方法的分诊时间、分诊准确率及患者满意度的差异。结果研究组分诊时间(1.94±0.30)min,低于对照组的(2.27±0.35)min,差异有统计学意义(t=6.99,P〈0.05)。研究组分诊正确率为96.0%,高于对照组的82.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.01,P〈0.05)。研究组患者满意度得分为(98.94±1.06)分,高于对照组的(89.30±5.95)分,差异有统计学意义(t=15.96,P〈0.01)。结论新的分诊记录单缩短了分诊时间,提高了急性胸痛患者分诊的正确率和患者满意度,值得临床推广。 Objective To introduce triage standard for non-traumatic chest pain and SOAPIE triage method into triage work for acute chest pain patients, and to investigate its effect. Methods Based on triage standard for non-traumatic chest pain and SOAPIE triage method, a new triage record was established. And triage time, triage accuracy and patient satisfaction were compared with conventional methods. Results The triage time of the research group was (1. 94 ± 0. 30) minutes, which was significantly lower than (2. 27 ± 0. 35) minutes of the control group (t =6. 99,P 〈0. 05). The triage accuracy of the research group was 96. 0%, which was significantly higher than 82. 0% of the control group (χ2 =10. 01,P〈0. 05). The score of patients′satisfaction was (98. 94 ± 1. 06), which was significantly higher than (89. 30 ± 5. 95) of the control group (t=15. 96,P 〈0. 01). Conclusions The new triage method can shorten the triage time, improve the triage accuracy and patients′satisfaction, which is worthy of promotion.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2015年第15期1845-1847,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 河北医学科学研究课题(20130170)
关键词 胸痛 满意度 预检分诊 护士 Chest pain Satisfaction Triage Nurse
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献73

共引文献132

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部