摘要
目的探讨经尿道前列腺电切剜除术与传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生患者的临床疗效。方法选取前列腺手术治疗的76例前列腺增生患者作为研究对象,观察组38例患者行经尿道前列腺电切剜除术,对照组38例患者行传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者术中出血量、腺体切除量和术后最大尿流率和住院时间均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者术后并发症发生例数明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经尿道前列腺电切剜除术相对于传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗效果良好,术中操作方便,并发症较少。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate enucleation and transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods Selection 76 cases of patients with BPH operation treatment as the research object,the observation group of 38 cases underwent transurethral resection of the prostate enucleation,38 patients in the control group conventional transurethral transurethral resection of the prostate,treatment effects were compared between the two groups. Results Observation group of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative resected tissue weight and maximum urinary flow rate and hospitalization time were less than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05); postoperative complications of the observation group were significantly less than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion Transurethral resection of the prostate enucleation compared with conventional transurethral transurethral resection of the prostate with good treatment effect,convenient operation,less complications.
出处
《中国药物经济学》
2015年第6期123-124,共2页
China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词
经尿道前列腺电切剜除术
传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术
前列腺增生
Transurethral resection of the prostate enucleation
The traditional transurethral electrovaporization ofthe prostate
Hyperplasia of prostate