基于高阶理论视角的战略双元研究被引量：1

A Research on Strategic Ambidexterity from the Perspective of Upper Echelons Theory

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章以高阶理论和资源依赖理论为基础,探讨了制度转型期中国企业高管团队行为整合、政治联系、中庸思维与战略双元之间的关系。通过问卷调查的方式进行实证研究,研究结果表明,高管团队行为整合、高管团队政治联系对战略双元有正向影响。高管团队中庸思维弱化了高管团队行为整合与战略双元之间的关系。 Based on upper echelons theory and resource dependence theory,the paper examines the relationship between top management team behavioral integration,political connection,Zhong-yong thinking and strategic ambidexterity in Chinese enterprises during the process of institutional transition. The paper also makes an empirical study through questionnaire sur？vey. The findings show that both top management team behavioral integration and top management team political connection have positive relationships with strategic ambidexterity. Furthermore, top management team Zhong-yong thinking weakens the relationship between top management team behavioral integration and strategic ambidexterity.

作者王艺霖王益民

机构地区山东大学管理学院

出处《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期102-107,共6页 East China Economic Management

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71072110) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目(NCET-11-0312)

关键词战略双元高管团队行为整合高管团队中庸思维高管团队政治联系 strategic ambidexterity top management team behavioral integration top management team Zhong-yong think-ing top management team political connection

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献36

1March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[ J ]. Organization Science, 1991,2 ( 1 ) : 71-87.
2Shinkle G A, Kriauciunas A P, Hundley G. Why pure strate- gies may be wrong for transition economy firms [J]. Strate- gic Management Journal, 2013,34(10) : 1244-1254.
3Duncan R B. The ambidextrous organization:Designing dual structures for innovation [J]. The Management of Organiza- tion, 1976(1) : 167-188.
4Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Acad- emy of management Journal, 2004,47 (2) : 209-226.
5王寅,张英华,杨德森,张建宇.基于生命周期的企业双元性创新机制研究——以天津制造业为例[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(5):164-170. 被引量：4
6罗彪,葛佳佳,王琼.探索型、挖掘型战略选择对组织绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2014,11(1):37-45. 被引量：26
7Voss G B, Voss Z G. Strategic ambidexterity in small andmedium-sized enterprises:Implementing exploration and ex- ploitation in product and market domains [J]. Organization Science, 2013,24(5) : 1459-1477.
8O' Reilly C A, Tushman M L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator' s dilemma [J ]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008,28 ( 1 ) : 185-206.
9O'Reilly C A, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future [J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013,27(4) : 324-338.
10Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, et al. Organizational am- bidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sus- tained performance [J]. Organizational Science, 2009, 20 (4) :685-695.

二级参考文献138

1唐菊裳.小企业在产品生命周期的不同阶段的创新特点[J].中国中小企业,1999,0(7):22-22. 被引量：4
2陈玥希,蔡建峰,郭鹏.基于行业生命周期的企业技术创新战略选择[J].科技与管理,2005,7(3):102-104. 被引量：16
3周长辉.中国企业战略变革过程研究:五矿经验及一般启示[J].管理世界,2005,21(12):123-136. 被引量：90
4郭亚军.模仿型创新战略与自主创新能力[J].西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）,2007,7(1):65-70. 被引量：2
5HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2) :193-206.
6HAMBRICK D C. Top Management Groups:A Conceptual Integration and Reconsideration of the "Team" Label[M]//B M CUMMINGS. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press, 1994(16):171-213.
7SIMSEK Z, VEIGA J F, LUBATKIN M H, et al. Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48( 1 ) :69-84.
8LI J, HAMBRICK D C. Factional Groups: A New Vantage on Demographic Fauhines, Conflict, and Disintegration in Work Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48 (5) : 794-813.
9HAMBRICK D C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2) :334-343.
10ABRAHAM C, JOHN S. Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, Decision Quality, and Organizational Decline[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(5) :441.