期刊文献+

佣金模式对二手房市场效率影响的实验 被引量:7

Effects of brokerage structure on secondary housing market efficiency:An experimental study
原文传递
导出
摘要 为比较研究不同中介佣金模式对二手房市场效率的影响,该文设计并组织3组二手房交易实验。实验研究结果表明:1)相比于"固定比例"佣金模式,在"固定佣金+超额比例"和"纯超额比例"佣金模式下,中介的积极性提高,二手房的成交价格和成交住房质量均上升,卖方剩余增加,买方剩余与中介剩余下降;2)在"固定比例"佣金模式下,市场效率最高。该文建议,不宜用"固定佣金+超额比例"模式和"纯超额比例"佣金模式替代"固定比例"佣金模式,应在完善"固定比例"佣金模式的同时,探索其他更优的佣金模式。 The effects of different brokerage structures on the secondary housing market efficiency were investigated using three groups of secondary housing trading experiments. The research results indicated that the "fixed brokerage + price excess proportion brokerage structure" and the "price excess proportion brokerage structure" increased broker motivation compared with the "fixed percentage of brokerage structure" with increased sale prices and house quality reduced seller surplus and improved buyer and broker surpluses. The market efficiency was the highest with the "fixed percentage of brokerage structure". Accordingly, the "fixed brokerage + price excess proportion brokerage structure" and the "price excess proportion brokerage structure" should not replace the "fixed percentage of brokerage structure", but an improved "fixed percentage of brokerage structure" should he developed.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期190-195,共6页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71373143)
关键词 佣金模式 二手房 中介 市场效率 实验研究 brokerage structures secondary house broker market efficiency experimental study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1曼昆,梁小民,梁砾.经济学原理:微观经济学分册[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
  • 2Johnson K H, Zumpano L V, Anderson R I. Intra-firm real estate brokerage compensation choices and agent performance [J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2008, 30(4) 423 - 440.
  • 3Crocker J. Competition and efficiency in transacting: The case of the residential real estate brokerage [J]. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 1982, 10(2) 209 -227.
  • 4Miceli T J. Thewelfare effects of non-price competition among real estate brokers [J]- Real Estate Economics, 1992, 20(4) : 519 - 532.
  • 5Villani K E, Simonson J. Real estate settlement pricing: A theoretical framework [J]. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 1982, 10(3) = 249- 275.
  • 6Yavas A. Matching of buyers and sellers by brokers= A comparison of alternative commission structures [J]. Real Estate Economics, 1996, 24(1): 97-112.
  • 7黄英,刘洪玉,刘琳.我国房地产经纪服务定价方法探讨[J].价格理论与实践,2005(7):40-41. 被引量:8
  • 8Delcoure N, Miller N G. International residential real estate brokerage fees and implications for the US brokerage industry [J]. International Real Estate Review, 2002, 5(1): 12 -39.
  • 9陈艳莹,周娟.双重道德风险下的房地产中介佣金制度研究[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010,31(1):16-20. 被引量:3
  • 10张红,张洋,李瑞.基于实验的住房市场信息披露对二手房价格的影响[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,36(5):621-624. 被引量:4

二级参考文献45

共引文献13

同被引文献82

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部