期刊文献+

姚河坝水电站厂房岩质边坡地震安全性分析 被引量:4

Study of seismic safety of back powerhouse rock slope of Yaoheba hydropower station
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用三维非线性有限元时程分析方法,结合姚河坝水电站厂房岩质边坡工程实例,在静力分析的基础上对水电站厂房后边坡的动力响应及抗震安全性进行分析.严格考虑了地基辐射阻尼效应,深入模拟锚索、锚杆、基础梁、框架梁、混凝土喷护等边坡加固措施,并详尽模拟了实际施工过程、地质地貌情况等.综合上述因素获得对边坡动力响应的科学评价.研究结果表明,位移、加速度基本上随着高程的升高而增大,应力分布从坡体表层向深部呈现逐层变化的特征.在坡体表面岩体脆弱带处的动力响应较为明显.并基于强度折减法理论,分析得出了边坡在设计地震作用下是安全的. Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element time-history method is carried out to explore the dynamic properties and seismic safety of back powerhouse rock slope of Yaoheba hydropower station based on the static calculation.Considering foundation radiation damping and reinforcing measures strictly,such as anchor cable,anchor,foundation beams,frame beams,concrete spray,etc,and the actual construction progress and geology and so on,are further simulated.Taking all these factors the scientific evaluation of the dynamic characteristics of the slope are obtained.The results demonstrate that:Displacement and acceleration increase basically with the increase of elevation;stress distribution changes from the surface to the depth step by step.The dynamic response is more obvious in fragile rock zone of slope surface.Finally,the slope is safe under earthquake based on the theory of strength reduction.
出处 《武汉大学学报(工学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期483-488,共6页 Engineering Journal of Wuhan University
关键词 三维岩质边坡 粘弹性边界 时程分析 动力特性 强度折减法 抗震安全性 3Drock slope viscoelastic boundary time-history analysis dynamic properties strength reduction seismic safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

共引文献763

同被引文献34

  • 1叶海林,郑颖人,李安洪,杜修力,赖杰.成兰铁路茂县车站高边坡抗震设计研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(S2):4117-4122. 被引量:3
  • 2张强勇,刘大文,蔡德文.Sarma法在加锚岩质高边坡安全稳定性评价分析中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(18):3368-3372. 被引量:19
  • 3刘云贺,张伯艳,陈厚群.拱坝地震输入模型中黏弹性边界与黏性边界的比较[J].水利学报,2006,37(6):758-763. 被引量:56
  • 4刘晶波,谷音,杜义欣.一致粘弹性人工边界及粘弹性边界单元[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(9):1070-1075. 被引量:419
  • 5DL 5073-2000 水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S].2001.
  • 6Kuhlemeyer R L, Lysmer J. 1973. Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problom [ J ]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division ,99 ( 5 ) :421 - 427.
  • 7Seed H B. 1979. Considerations in Earth and Rock Fill Dams [ J ] the Earthquake Resistant Design of Geotechnique ,29 ( 3 ) :213 - 263.
  • 8Li Z, Huang H,Nadim F,et al. Quantitative risk as-sessment of cut-slope projects under construction[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engi-neering, 2010,136(12) : 1644-1654.
  • 9Huang J,Lyamin A V,Griffiths D V,et al. Quanti-tative risk assessment of landslide by limit analysis andrandom fields [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013,53: 60-67.
  • 10Li D Q,Xiao T, Cao Z J,et al. Enhancement of ran-dom finite element method in reliability analysis andrisk assessment of soil slopes using Subset Simulation[J]. Landslides,2016, 13: 293-303.

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部