期刊文献+

多维视角下的历史性权利研究 被引量:1

Multidimensional View on Historic Right
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据条约法解释理论,《联合国海洋法公约》并没有对历史性权利的地位做出明确规定,但也没有否定历史性权利的存在。历史性权利是一般国际法规则在特殊情况下的适用,属于习惯国际法。时际法是国家取得领土主权的重要国际法原则,也是解决国家领土纠纷的重要依据,是我国在维护南海主权的有效法理支撑。解决南海争端,维护我国南海权益,需要从更高的国际海洋法层次乃至国际法的视野来看待和审视历史性权利的性质和地位,需要从发现原则、先占原则、禁止反言原则等岛屿争端的其他法律解决机制寻求到支持。 According to the theoretical interpretation of treaty law, though“UNCLOS” did not make clear the status of historic rights, it did not deny the existence of historic rights, either. Historic rights, be- longing to customary international law, are the application of general international law to exceptional cir- cumstances. Intertemporal law is an important principle of international law for a country to obtain territo- rial sovereignty and an important basis for solving the territorial disputes, which acts as an effective legal support for China to maintain its sovereignty over the South China Sea. To resolve the South China Sea disputes and safeguard China's interests of the South China Sea, China needs to examine the nature and sta- tus of historic rights from a higher perspective of international law and international law of the sea and to seek support from find legal resolution mechanisms such as the principles of discovery, preemption, and estoppel.
作者 高志宏
出处 《南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期44-50,共7页 Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics(Social Sciences)
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(NR2015007)
关键词 历史性权利 《联合国海洋法公约》 条约法解释 时际法 南海争端 historic rights United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea interpretation of treaty law intertemporal law South China Sea dispute
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献46

共引文献115

同被引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部