公共企事业单位信息公开诉讼研究——兼及《政府信息公开条例》第37条的分析

The Study of Information Disclosure Litigation for Public Enterprises and Institutions—— Analysis on Article 37 of the Regulations on Government Information Disclosure

《政府信息公开条例》第37条规定了公共企事业单位信息公开的义务,并要求"参照"条例前36条执行。但是,现实中由于第37条规定的过于原则和对此的理解偏差而导致公共企事业单位信息公开救济途径频频受阻。在此背景下,不仅需要将第37条置于整个条例中进行定位,分析"参照"的涵义及"参照"适用的解释,也需要通过对"王聚才诉联通公司案"和"葛某某诉中国电信案"进行规范解读来寻求"参照"的法律依据和法理支撑,以此来印证公共企事业单位信息公开诉讼的可及性。

Article 37 of the Regulations on Government Information Disclosure defines an obligation for the public enterprises and institutions to disclose their information, and it also requires that the preceding 36 articles be referred to in execution. However,because Article 37 gets too principle and easy to be misunderstood in real practice, the legal advocacy channels for the information disclosure by the public enterprises and institutions are frequently blocked. Under such circumstances, it is necessary not only to define the positioning of the Article 37 in the Regulations, and to analyze the implications and the applicative explanations of ＂referring to＂, but also to seek legal ground and legal theory support of ＂referring to＂ by normative interpretation of the cases such as Wang Jucai vs Unicom Company and Ge XX vs China Telecom. Such so, it’s possible for us to verify the accessibility of the information disclosure litigation for public enterprises and institutions.