期刊文献+

中小学教师科研活动与教师专业性的提升——基于工具性、认识论和批判性的视角 被引量:3

Teacher Research in School and Teachers' Professionalism:Integrating instrumental, epistemological and critical perspectives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中小学教师的专业性及其专业身份一直以来受到来自政府、专家或研究者、市场等的诸多质疑。教师科研的实践与理念,让我们重新思考教师作为专业人员的可能性。本文从工具性、认识论、批判性三个层面,论述了教师科研如何保障和提升教师的专业性。工具性层面:教师科研有助于提升教师的研究意识、技能和信心,并促进教师知识的增长;认识论层面:教师科研重新发现教师个人知识的价值,扩展"作为专业的教学"的知识基础;批判性层面:教师科研重构知识生产中的权力关系,并有助于推动教育公平与正义。 Teachers' identity as professional is always questioned in the atmosphere of educational bureaucratization, marketization and teacher professionalization. The teacher research movement all over the world gives us a new perspective to reexamine closely the possibility of teacher professionalism. This review elaborated how teacher research protects and improves front-line teachers' professionalism from instrumental, epistemological, and critical perspectives. From the instrumental perspective, conducting inquiry by teachers themselves can improve teachers' research competence as well as promote their educational knowledge construction. And, teacher research legitimizes the value of teacher personal knowledge and extends teaching knowledge base in terms of epistemology. Critically, teacher research contributes to reshape power relations in the process of educational knowledge production, which further is beneficial to education equity and justice in the broader social context..
出处 《基础教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期105-112,共8页 Journal of Schooling Studies
关键词 教师科研 教师专业性 教师专业发展 知识基础 权力关系 Teacher research Teacher professionalism Teacher professional development Knowledge base Power relation
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Hoyle, E.. Changing conceptions of teaching as a profession: Personal Reflections [M]// Johnson, David, Maclean, Rupert (Eds.). Teaching: professionalization, development and leadershlp. Netherlands: Springer, 2008:285-304.
  • 2Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I.. Teachers' professional lives: lspirations and actualities[M]//Ivor F. Goodson & Andy Hargreaves iEds.). Teachers'professional gves. London: Falmer Press, 1996: 1-25.
  • 3Swann, M. et al. Teachers' conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006 [J]. Bdtlsh Educational Research Journal, 2010, 36 (4): 549-571.
  • 4Stenhouse, L.. An introduction to curriculum research and development [M]. London: Heinemann, 1975: 143-144.
  • 5Evans, L.. Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals [J]. British journal of educational studies, 2008, 56(1): 20-38.
  • 6Labaree, D. F.. Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching [J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1992, 62(2): 123-155.
  • 7陈柏华,高凌飚.教师专业发展之行动研究[J].课程.教材.教法,2007,27(10):77-82. 被引量:11
  • 8Berger, J. G., Boles, K.C., & Troen, V.. Teacher research and school change: paradoxes, problems, and possibilities [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2005, 21(1): 93-105.
  • 9Snoek, M., & Moens, E.. The impact of teacher research on teacher learning in academic training schools in the Netherlands[J]. Professional Development in Education, 2011, 37 (5): 817-835.
  • 10Corte, M. V. et al. Teacher research in Dutch professional development schools: perceptions of the actual and preferredsituation in terms of the context, process and outcomes of Rsearch [J]. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2013, 36 ( 1): 3-23.

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈洁.浅谈学校教育科研管理[J].上海教育科研,1992(3):57-58. 被引量:1
  • 2Peircc, C. What Pragmatism Is[J]. The Monist, 1905, (2).
  • 3Thayer, H. Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism [ M ]. Bobbs-Merrill : Indianapolis. 1968. 429,173. Merriam Webster's 1 lth Collegiate Dictionary[Z]. 2003.
  • 4Dewey, J. Experience and Nature[M]. In The late works (1925-1953). Vol. 1, edited by Jo Ann Boydston, Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press. 1925.18,19,141.
  • 5Siesta, G. & Burbulcs, N. Pragmatism and Educational Rresearch [M]. Oxford: Rowman &Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2003.25 , 11,30,37,44,46, 5 l, 43,47.
  • 6Sleeper, R. W. The Necessity of Pragmatism: John Dewey's Conception of Philosophy[M]. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  • 7Dewey, J. The Quest for Certainty [M]. New York: Minton, Balch & Company. 1929. 295,291,207,291,81,296,151,151,104,295.
  • 8Dewy, J. Human Nature and Conduct [M]. In The Middle Works (1899-1924). Vol.14, edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern lllinois University Press, 1922. 9, 11,32,132-132.
  • 9Dewey, J. Reconstruction in Philosophy [M]. In The Middle Works (1899-1924) , Vol. 12, edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1920.129.
  • 10Dewey, J. Logic : the Theory of Inquiry [ M ]. In The Later Works (1925-1953) , Vol. 12, edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univeity Press, 1938. 108.

共引文献67

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部