期刊文献+

碳管法燃煤烟气汞浓度取样装置研制(英文)

A novel carbon trap sampling system for coal-fired flue gas mercury measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自主研制了包括内置吸附剂和两段式碳吸附管在内的整套新型碳管法烟气汞浓度取样装置,以期实现燃煤烟气中颗粒汞和气相总汞浓度的精确测量.在6kW燃煤循环流化床装置上同时采用碳管法与安大略标准法(OHM)进行烟气中汞浓度取样.结果表明,碳管法所得汞平衡率均处于95.47%~104.72%之间.不同工况下碳吸附管第2段穿透率始终低于2%,且与相同工况下OHM测试结果的相对偏差在15.96%~17.56%之间,均小于20%.结果表明,所研制的碳吸附管干法烟气汞浓度取样装置符合美国EPA质量保证和质量控制(QA/QC)标准,可应用于实际燃煤烟气汞浓度的取样测试. A novel carbon trap sampling system for gas-phase mercury measurement in flue gas is developed, including the high efficient sorbents made of modified biomass cokes and high precision sorbent traps for measuring particle-bound and total vapor-phase mercury in flue gas. A dedusting device is installed to collect fine fly ash for reducing the measurement errors. The thorough comparison test of mercury concentration in flue gas is conducted between the novel sampling system and the Ontario hydro method (OHM) in a 6 kW circulating fluidized bed combustor. Mercury mass balance rates of the OHM range from 95.47% to 104.72%. The mercury breakthrough rates for the second section of the sorbent trap are all below 2%. The relative deviations in the two test cases are in the range of 15. 96% to 17. 56% under different conditions. The verified data suggest that this novel carbon trap sampling system can meet the standards of quality assurance and quality control required by EPA Method 30B and can be applied to the coal-fired flue gas mercury sampling system.
出处 《Journal of Southeast University(English Edition)》 EI CAS 2015年第2期244-248,共5页 东南大学学报(英文版)
基金 The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51376046,51076030) the National Science and Technology Support Program of China(No.2012BAA02B01) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities the Scientific Innovation Research of College Graduates in Jiangsu Province(No.CXZZ13_0093,KYLX_0115,KYLX_018)
关键词 汞吸附管 燃煤烟气 汞取样装置 mercury sorbent trap coal-fired flue gas mercury sampling unit
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1杨祥花,段钰锋,杨林军,杨立国,江贻满.燃煤电厂烟气中的汞浓度测量[J].能源研究与利用,2005(5):25-29. 被引量:17
  • 2Nenad Sarunac. Evaluation and Comparison of U. S. and EU Reference Methods for Measurement of Mercury, Heavy Metals,PM2. 5 and PM10 Emissions from Fossil-fired Power Plants [ R ]. Bethlehem : Lehigh University,2007.
  • 3William Roberson, Jack Martin, Richard McRanie. Summary of Method 30B Evaluation ( Sorbent Trap Reference Method for Hg) [ R]. Raleigh: RMB Consulting & Research Inc, 2007.
  • 4Energy & Environmental Research Center. Determining the Variability of Continuous Mercury Monitors (CMMS) at Low Mercury Concentrations [ R ]. Grand Forks: Energy & Environmental Research Center ,2011.
  • 5张凡,石应杰,王洪昌.中国燃煤汞污染控制技术研究进展[R].北京:中国环境科学研究院.2011.
  • 6John P Kay, Dennis L Laudal, Nathan J Fiala, et al. Performance of Mercury CEMS at North American Coal-Fired Power Plants [ R ]. Arizona: Energy and Environmental Research Center, 2010.
  • 7Midwest Research Institute. Long-Term Field Evaluation of Mercury (Hg) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems: Coal-Fired Power Plant Burning Eastern Bituminous Coal and Equipped with Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP), and Wet Scrubber: Field Activities from November 2004 to September 2005 [ R ]. Kansas: Midwest Research Institute .2006.
  • 8杨立国,段钰锋,杨祥花,江贻满,王运军,赵长遂.燃煤电厂汞排放特性实验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,37(5):817-821. 被引量:27
  • 9Yang H,Xu Z,Fan M,Bland A,Judkins R.Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-firedboiler flue gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials . 2007
  • 10UNEP AMAP.Technical Background Report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/UNEP Chemicals Branch. . 2008

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部