期刊文献+

癫痫持续状态相关危险因素分析 被引量:6

The related influencing factors of status epilepticus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨癫痫持续状态(SE)的相关危险因素情况。方法选取亳州市人民医院收治的129例癫痫患者,将79例SE患者作为SE组,未发生SE的50例患者作为对照组。回顾分析两组患者一般资料,同时分析两组患者颅脑损伤、病毒性脑炎急性期、脑血管病等情况,对SE的影响因素进行统计分析。结果两组患者颅脑损伤、病毒性脑炎急性期、脑血管病、不规则服药差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者家族史、脑皮质发育异常、CO中毒或者酒精中毒、颅内占位病变、发热、脑血管畸形差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。通过logistic回归分析,颅脑损伤、病毒性脑炎急性期、脑血管病、不规则服药为SE的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论颅脑损伤、病毒性脑炎急性期、脑血管病、不规则服药是SE发生的危险因素,及时规避SE的相关危险因素,对于临床治疗和提高预后均有重要意义。 Objective To approach the related influencing factors of status epilepticus( SE) . Methods The clinical data of 79 ca-ses of SE patients in our hospital were analysed, then patients without SE were selected as control group, then the influence of brain injury, acute viral encephalitis, stroke on SE was analysed. Results The difference in brain injury, acute viral encephalitis, stroke, irregular medi-cation of the two groups had statistical significance(P〈0. 05), while correlative factors like family history, cerebral cortical dysplasia, car-bon monoxide poisoning or alcoholism, intracranial lesions occupied, fever, cerebrovascular malformation of the two groups showed no differ-ence(P〉0. 05). Based on logistic regression analysis, brain injury, acute viral encephalitis, stroke, and irregular medication were inde-pendent risk factors of SE (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Brain injury, acute viral encephalitis, stroke, irregular medication are independent risk factors of SE patients. Timely avoiding related influencing factors of SE is important in clinical treatment and improvement of the prognosis.
作者 武晓芳
出处 《安徽医学》 2015年第6期712-714,共3页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 癫痫持续状态 危险因素 LOGISTIC 回归分析 Status epilepticus Influencing factor Logistic regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献133

  • 1丛乃旺,王宝忠.320例脑卒中后癫痫的临床分析[J].实用全科医学,2006,4(5):605-605. 被引量:4
  • 2张俊湖,滕伟禹.桥本氏脑病[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2007,34(2):154-157. 被引量:11
  • 3Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, M acdonald RL. It is time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia, 1999, 40 (1) : 120-122.
  • 4Theodore WH, Porter R J, Albert P, et al. The secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure: a videotape analysis. Neurology, 1994, 44(8) : 1403-1407.
  • 5Commission on classification and Terminology of the Interna- tional league Against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised clinical and electroecphalogzaphic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia, 1981, 22(4) : 489-501.
  • 6Engel J. A proposal diagnostic scheme for people with epileptic seizures and with epilepsy : report of the ILAE Task Force on classification and terminology. Epilepsia, 2001, 42 (6) : 796-803.
  • 7Mayer SA, Claassen J, Lokin J, et al. Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Arch Neurol, 2002, 59: 205-210.
  • 8Parviainen I, Uusaro A, Kalviainen R, et al. Highdose thiopental in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in intensive care unit. Neurology, 2002, 59(8) : 1249-1251.
  • 9Niermeijer JM, Uiterwaal CS, Van Donselaar CA. Propofol in status Epilepticus: little evidence, many dangers. J Neurol, 2003, 250(10) : 1237-1240.
  • 10Costello DJ, Cole AJ. Treatment of Acute Seizures and Status Epilepticus. J Intensive Care Med, 2007, 22(6) : 319- 347.

共引文献70

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部