期刊文献+

基于内容证据的PETS-4口试效度研究

Validation Study of PETS-4 Oral Test: A Study Based on Content Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究依据语言测试效度理论,通过检查表、问卷调查和访谈方法收集"内容相关与内容覆盖"、"测试任务特征"和"测试实施环境特征"等口试的"内容证据",检验了2013年9月PETS-4口试的效度。研究结果表明:1)PETS-4口试任务内容相关和内容覆盖恰当,符合预设的考查内容与目标;2)PETS-4口试任务特征和实施环境特征有利于拟测构念的表现,具体表现为:(1)口试任务充分体现了测试设计者预设的"交际模式"、"交际功能"、"口试渠道"和"真实性"等口试特征,考官语言输出用语严格一致;(2)测试场景、施测程序符合测试整体要求。上述证据综合表明2013年9月的PETS-4口试在内容证据方面具有较高的效度。 This study, employing checklist, questionnaire and interview, validated PETS-4 oral test administered in Sep 2013, on the basis of content-related evidence by collecting evidence from "content-relat- ed", "content-coverage", "task demand" and features of "the context of oral test". The results indicate that: 1 ) test tasks in PETS-4 do represent and cover the target domain; 2) The characteristics of test tasks and contexts both facilitate the construct supposed to be tested, specifically: ( 1 ) test-tasks in PETS- 4 fully represent the presupposed characteristics of oral communication in terms of discourse mode, communicative function, channel and authenticity. Language input of interlocutors is strict and uniform; (2) settings and administration settings all meet the general requirements of oral test. Considering the evidence listed above, we may conclude that PETS-4 oral test administered in Sep 2013 is of high validity in terms of content-related evidence.
出处 《山东外语教学》 2015年第3期47-56,共10页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 国家社科基金项目"整体效度观下的语言测试效度研究:基于证据的效度验证"(项目编号:13BYY085)的部分成果
关键词 全国公共英语等级考试 口试 效度 内容证据 Public English Test System oral test validity content-related evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Alderson, J. C., C. Clapham & D. Wall. Language Test Construction andEvaluation[M]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1995.
  • 2Anastasi, A. Psychological Testing (6th ed. )[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1988.
  • 3APA. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing[ Z]. Washington, DC: APA, 1999.
  • 4Bachman, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[ M:. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1990.
  • 5Bachman, L. F. Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts [ J 1. Language Testing, 2000,17( 1 ) :1 -42.
  • 6Bachman, L. F & A. Palmer. Language Testing in Practice[ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996.
  • 7Cronbach, L. J. Five Perspectives on validity Argument[C]. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (eds.). Test Validi- ty. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun, 1988.3-17.
  • 8Douglas, D. Assessing Language for Specific Purposes: Theory and Practice[ M]. Cambridge: CUP,2000.
  • 9ETS. Test of Spoken English and Speak Score User Gu/de [ Z ]. Princeton, N J: Educational Testing Service. ht- tp ://www. toefl, org/tse/tesindex, html. 2001. [ 2014-03-05 ].
  • 10Khalifa, H. (ed). Student Achievement Test Development Manual[Z]. Egypt: USAID, 2003.

二级参考文献254

共引文献275

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部