期刊文献+

杂交技术治疗巨大切口疝 被引量:6

Hybrid technique in the treatment of huge abdominal incisional hernia: An analysis of clinic therapeutic effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估运用切除疝囊、组织分离、结合腹腔镜的杂交技术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝可行性及临床价值。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年5月,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院西区采用单纯开放手术及杂交技术治疗的巨大腹壁切口疝195例患者的临床资料(主动减容患者除外)。对比二种手术方法手术难度、安全性、并发症、术后恢复及术后复发等情况。结果二种手术方法的时间接近。杂交组切口长度(8±4)cm明显小于开放组(15±5)cm。开放组和杂交组住院时间相当。术后随访6~48个月。二组并发症比较,开放组的浆液肿10例高于杂交组4例,均无术后死亡。开放组术后复发1例,杂交组无复发;复发患者均于术后2年内再次接受杂交技术治疗并治愈。结论应用杂交技术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝较开放手术具有一定的优势。 Objective To analyze the clinical value of the hybrid technique in the treatment of huge abdominal incisional hernia. Methods The clinical data of 195 cases of huge abdominal incisional hernia admitted to Beijing Chao-yang Hospital from January 2008 to May 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The operational course and the postoperative status among open( 93 cases) and the hybrid technique( 102 cases) performed in huge abdominal incisional hernia were compared. Results The mean time of operation in the open group and the hybrid technique are similar. The length of incision in the hybrid group( 8 ± 4) cm was shorter than that in the open group( 15 ± 5) cm. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months.10 cases developed complication in the open group,4 in the hybrid group,and no death cases. One case developed recurrence in the open group,none in the hybrid group. All the recurrent cases were cured by hybrid technique in 2 years after operation. Conclusion The hybrid technique has superior advantages compared with open technique in the treatment of huge abdominal incisional hernia.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2015年第3期37-39,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹部 外科技术 Hernia abdominal Surgical procedures operative
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:629
  • 2Santora TA, Rosalyn JJ. Incisional hernia. Surg Clin North Am, 1993,73:557.
  • 3Thoman DS, Phillips ES. Current status of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc ,2002,16:939.
  • 4Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Boffi B, et al. Incisional hernia repair retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Surg Endosc, 2003,17 ( 10 ) : 1546 - 1551.
  • 5Lomanto D, Iyer SG, Shabbir A, et al. laparoscopic versus Open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc,2006, 20(7) :1030 - 1035.
  • 6Olmi S, Magnone S, Erba L, et al. Resuhs of laparoscopic versus open abdominal and incisional hernia repair. JSLS, 2005,9 ( 2 ) : 189 - 195.
  • 7Reingruber B, Kastl S, Stremmel C, et al. Incisional hernia repair: tensiometey for the selection of the appropriate procedure. Eur J Surg,2001,167(12) :903 -908.
  • 8Razman J, Shaharin S, Lukman MR, et al. Initial experience of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Med J Malaysia,2006,61 ( 2 ) : 142 - 146.
  • 9Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, van Ramshorst GH, et al. A muhicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions. BMC Surg, 2011,26:11-20.
  • 10Poelman MM, Langenhorst BL, Schellekens JF, et al. Modified onlay technique for the repair of the more complicated incisional hernias: single-centre evaluation of a large cohort. Hernia,2010,14:369-374.

共引文献314

同被引文献60

  • 1陈育洪,王婕,陈俊勇,龙连生,谢正勇,丁洪亮,程黎阳.腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(6):658-662. 被引量:1
  • 2姚琪远.腹腔镜疝修补手术常见并发症及处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(9):708-710. 被引量:72
  • 3Bauer J, HmTis M, Gorfine S, et al. Rives-Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias : experience with 57 patients [ J ].Hernia ,2002,6 ( 3 ) : 120-123.
  • 4Muller-Riemenschneider F, Roll S, Friedrich M, et al. Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: A systematic review [ J~. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 (12) :2127-2136.
  • 5McMahon M, Kehdy F. Laparoscoplc llepalr oI lngmnm anu Incisional Hernias [ J ], Am Surg, 2011,77 (4) : 389-400.
  • 6Salvilla SA, Thusu S, Panesar SS. Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2012,8(4) :111- 117.
  • 7Cobb SW, Kercher WK, Matthews DB, et al. Laparoseopic ventralhernia repair: a single center experience ~ J~. Hernia, 2006, 10(3) :236-242.
  • 8Eker HH, Hansson BE, Buunen M, et al. Laparoscopie vs open incisional hernia repair: A randomized elinieal trial I J 1- JAMA Surgery, 2013,148(3) :259-263.
  • 9Bencini L, 5anehez JL, Boffi B, et al. lneisional hernia: repair retrospective eomparison of laparoscopic and open techniques [ J l- Surg Endosc, 2003,17 (10) : 1546-1551.
  • 10Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R , et al. The comparison of laparoseopic and open ventral hernia repairs : a prospective randomized studyrJ]. Hernia. 2007_ 11 ( 1 ) :1-56.

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部