摘要
本文以图书情报档案学科15种核心期刊为研究对象,以中国知网为数据源,研究1994—2013年(20年)期刊论文发表后1年、2年、5年以及发表迄今的零被引率、均值、标准差、变异系数,及高被引与零被引论文量比值。结论表明:零被引论文率均值与篇均被引率、H指数负相关,与综合排名正相关;零被引论文率在不同时间、期刊、学科间差异明显。在20年间,论文发表1年后其零被引率为90%左右;2—5年中,零被引率呈快速下降趋势;5年之后,论文零被引率呈缓慢下降趋势,大部分处于30%以下。不同年份发表的论文,特定年后零被引率在早期下降明显,但自2003年后,论文零被引率趋于稳定,发表5年后和发表迄今分别为20%和15%左右。各期刊的高被引与零被引论文量比值存在差异,其中《中国图书馆学报》优势明显。
In this article, we used 15 core journals of library and information and archives science as the research object, the CNKI as the data source. We studied on not-cited rate, the average value of not-cited rate, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and the highly cited and zero cited paper ratio of journal papers published after 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and all the years from 1994 to 2013. The conclusion shows that: the average value rate of not-cited articles have negative correlation with average citation and H index, but have a positive correlation with the comprehensive ranking; the rate of not-cited articles is different in different time, different journals and different subjects. The not-cited rate of 1 year after the publication is about 90 percent; 2 to 5 years' not-cited rate decreased rapidly; 5 years later, the not-cited rate decreased slowly, most lower than 30 percent. Different years published papers' not-cited rate is decreased quickly in the early days, but since 2003, the paper published 5 years and all the years' not-cited rate tends to be stable, respectively about 20 percent and 15 percent. The ratio of highly cited and zero cited paper is different in different journals, and "Journal of Library Science In China" have obvious advantages.
出处
《情报学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期247-256,共10页
Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金
全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目“网络环境下学者合著与引证行为规律研究”(2014094)阶段性成果
关键词
图书情报档案
学术期刊
未被引论文
library-information-archives science, academic journals, not-cited paper