期刊文献+

南海航道安全保障法律机制有效性与局限性研究 被引量:3

On the Effectiveness and Limitations of the Channel Security Legal Systems of the South China Sea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了应对海上航道安全威胁,南海各方经过努力形成了航道安全保障法律机制。该机制具有一定有效性,但也存在许多局限性,如合作机制的软法性导致遵约和履约行为的非拘束性、合作机制固有的妥协性与弱惩戒性损害其权威性、合作机制的原则性影响权利义务的确定性、合作机制的独立性受限于国际势力干预性,以及合作机制的公共物品属性影响其实效性。这些局限需要南海各方协同以破解制度困境:构建软硬法有机联系的合作法律机制;完善航道安全保障法律机制的内在构成要素;协同努力确保合作法律机制的独立性;强化南海各方有效合作的"选择性诱因"机制。 In order to deal with the problem of the channel Security,the nations boarding the South Sea have de-veloped the channel security legal systems of Maritime Silk Road,which has certain effectiveness. However,the limitations are soft law leading to non-binding,fuzziness affecting the certainty of rights and obligations,independ-ence of the mechanism difficult to get rid of intrusiveness,public goods difficult to ensure its effectiveness,which demand all to crack the dilemmas of systems:developing appropriately the legal mechanisms of cooperation which are included hard and soft laws systematically,not affected by outside forces,perfect internal components,and in-creasing the tools to promote effective implementation.
作者 李建勋
出处 《东南亚研究》 CSSCI 2015年第3期44-51,共8页 Southeast Asian Studies
基金 2014年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"南海低敏感领域区域合作法律机制研究"(14YJA820014)
关键词 南海 航道安全 法律机制 the South China Sea Channel Security Legal System
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Arild Underdal, "The Concept of Regime Effec- tiveness", Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 227 --240.
  • 2Oran R. Young, International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment, Ithaca, New York: Comell University Press, 1989.
  • 3Int'l Maritime Org. (IMO), "Jakarta Statement on Enhancement of Safety, Security and Environmental Protection in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore", IMO Doe. IMO/JKT 1/ 2, Sept. 8, 2005 ; Ian Storey, "Securing Southeast Asia's Sea Lanes : A Work in Progress", Asia Policy, No. 6, July 2008.
  • 4H.K. Jac obson, Edith B. Weiss, "Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Lessons from a National Perspective", in Mats Rolen, Helen Sjoberg & U. Svedin eds. , International Governance on Environmental Issues, Do~recht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 83.
  • 5Hovi, Jon, Deflef F. Sprinz & Arild Underdal, "Re- gime Effectiveness and the Oslo-Potsdam Solution: A Rejoinder to Oran Young", Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 105 - 107.
  • 6[美]奥兰·R.扬:《国际制度的有效性:棘手案例与关键因素》,载(美)詹姆斯N.罗西瑙主编,张胜军等译《没有政府的治理》,江西人民出版社,2001年,第187-189页.
  • 7Edith B. Weiss, "Rethinking Compliance with Imernational Law", in Eyal Benvenisti & Moshe Hirsh eds. , The l~t of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoret- ical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004,Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 140.
  • 8Stryken, Christian-Marius, "The US Regional Mari- time Security Initiative and US grand strategy in Southeast Asia", in Kwa Chong Guan & John K. Skogan eds. , Maritime Security in Southeast As/a, New York, NY : Roufledge, 2007, p. 135.
  • 9Arild Underdal, "Methodological Challenges in the Study of Institutional Effectiveness", in Arild Underdal & Oran R. Young eds. , Regime Consequences: Methodological Ghallen- ges and Research Strategies, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 27 -48.
  • 10Edith B. Weiss, Harold K. Jacobson, Engaging Coun- tries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000, p. 4.

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部