期刊文献+

EFFECTS OF MODERATE NOISE EXPOSURE ON HEARING FUNCTION IN C57BL/6J MICE 被引量:1

EFFECTS OF MODERATE NOISE EXPOSURE ON HEARING FUNCTION IN C57BL/6J MICE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective To study characteristics of hearing loss after exposure to moderate noise exposure in C57BL/6J mice. Methods Male C57BL/6J mice with normal hearing at age of 5-6 weeks were chosen for this study. The mice were randomly sclccted to be studied immediately after exposure (Group P0), or 1 day (Group P1), 3 days (Group P3), 7 day (Group P7) or 14 days (P14) after exposure. Their before exposure condition served as the normal control. All mice were exposed to a broad-band white noise at 100 dB SPL for 2 hours, ABR thresholds were used to estimate hearing status at each time point. Results ABR threshold elevation was seen at every tested frequency at P0 (P〈0.01). Elevation at high-frequencies (16 kHz and 32 kHz) was greater than at lower frequencies (4 kHz and 8 kHz, P〈0.05). From P1 to P14, ABR thresholds continuously improved, and there was no significant difference between P14 and before exposure (P〉0.05). Conclusion There is a frequency specific re- sponse to 100 dB SPL broad-band white noise in C57BL/6J mice, with the high-frequency being more susceptible. Hearing loss induced by moderate noise exposure appears reversible in C57BL/6J mice. Objective To study characteristics of hearing loss after exposure to moderate noise exposure in C57BL/6J mice. Methods Male C57BL/6J mice with normal hearing at age of 5-6 weeks were chosen for this study. The mice were randomly sclccted to be studied immediately after exposure (Group P0), or 1 day (Group P1), 3 days (Group P3), 7 day (Group P7) or 14 days (P14) after exposure. Their before exposure condition served as the normal control. All mice were exposed to a broad-band white noise at 100 dB SPL for 2 hours, ABR thresholds were used to estimate hearing status at each time point. Results ABR threshold elevation was seen at every tested frequency at P0 (P〈0.01). Elevation at high-frequencies (16 kHz and 32 kHz) was greater than at lower frequencies (4 kHz and 8 kHz, P〈0.05). From P1 to P14, ABR thresholds continuously improved, and there was no significant difference between P14 and before exposure (P〉0.05). Conclusion There is a frequency specific re- sponse to 100 dB SPL broad-band white noise in C57BL/6J mice, with the high-frequency being more susceptible. Hearing loss induced by moderate noise exposure appears reversible in C57BL/6J mice.
出处 《Journal of Otology》 2014年第2期81-85,共5页 中华耳科学杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by grants from the Liaoning Science and Technology Project(No.2011225017,2012225021) the National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program)(2012CB967900,2012CB967901) supported by the grants from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation(5122040) the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(201003779,20100470103) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC,31040038)
关键词 C57BL/6J mice Noise exposure Hearing loss Temporary noise-induced hearing loss ABR threshold shift C57BL/6J mice Noise exposure Hearing loss Temporary noise-induced hearing loss ABR threshold shift
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Ising H, Kruppa B. Health effects caused by noise: evidence in the literature from the past 25 years. Noise Health,2004,6(22): 5-13.
  • 2Stansfeld S, Haines M, Brown B. Noise and health in the ur?ban environment. Rev Environ Health,2000,15(1-2):43-82.
  • 3Fuente A, Hickson L. Noise-induced hearing loss in Asia. Int J Audiol,20 II ,50(suppl)1 :S3-1 O.
  • 4Miedema HME, Oudshoorn CGM. Annoyance from transporta?tion noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their con fi dence intervals. Environ Health Perspect,2001,109 (4):409-416.
  • 5Muzet A. Environmental noise, sleep and health. Sleep Med Rev,2007, 11(2): 135-142.
  • 6Cheng L, Wang SH, Chen QC, Liao XM. Moderate noise in- duced cognition impairment of mice and its underlying mecha?nisms. Physiol Behav,20 11,1 04(5):981-988.
  • 7van Kempen E, Babisch W. The quantitative relationship be?tween road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Hy?pertens,20 12,30(6): 1075-1086.
  • 8Sorensen M, Andersen ZJ, Nordsborg RB, et a1. Road traffic noise and incident myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One,2012,7(6):e39283.
  • 9Henderson D, Salvi RJ. Effects on noise exposure on the audi?tory functions. Scand Audiol Suppl,1998,48:63-73.
  • 10Wang Y, Hirose K, Liberman Me. Dynamics of noise-in?duced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol,2002,3 :248-268.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部